Persistent Data Retention Models

Tiancong Wang; James Tuck

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2009.14705

Persistent Data Retention Models

Tiancong Wang·James Tuck

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Non-Volatile Memory devices may soon be a part of main memory, and programming models that give programmers direct access to persistent memory through loads and stores are sought to maximize the performance benefits of these new devices. Direct access introduces new challenges. In this work, we identify an important aspect of programming for persistent memory: the persistent data retention model. A Persistent Data Retention Model describes what happens to persistent data when code that uses it is modified. We identify two models present in prior work but not described as such, the Reset and Manual Model, and we propose a new one called the Automatic Model. The Reset model discards all persistent data when a program changes leading to performance overheads and write amplification. In contrast, if data is to be retained, the Manual Model relies on the programmer to implement code that upgrades data from one version of the program to the next. This reduces overheads but places a larger burden on the programmer. We propose the Automatic Model to assist a programmer by automating some or all of the conversion. We describe one such automatic approach, Lazily Extendible Data Structures, that uses language extensions and compiler support to reduce the effort and complexity associated with updating persistent data. We evaluate our PDRMs in the context of the Persistent Memory Development Kit (PMDK) using kernels and the TPC-C application. Manual Model shows an overhead of 2.90% to 4.10% on average, and LEDS shows overhead of 0.45% to 10.27% on average, depending on the workload. LEDS reduces the number of writes by 26.36% compared to Manual Model. Furthermore, LEDS significantly reduces the programming complexity by relying on the compiler to migrate persistent data.

Explore related subjects

cs.PL

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Tiancong Wang, James Tuck. 2020-09-30. Persistent Data Retention Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.14705

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

From Rocq to Metal: A Pipeline for Formally Verified Microcontroller Firmware

Enforcing invariants in safety-critical firmware is increasingly urgent as generated code becomes widespread, but standard extraction targets for proof assistants require runtimes too large for many embedded devices. We present a pipeline for running formally verified Rocq firmware logic on Cortex-M microcontrollers. The pipeline extracts Gallina to Scheme, compiles it with Encore!, a bare-metal Continuation Passing Style (CPS) bytecode virtual machine, and embeds the result in no_std Rust firmware. We structure applications as pure state-transition functions, so the business logic is proved in Rocq while the event/effect boundary, host callbacks, compiler, and VM remain explicit trusted components. On ST33-class targets with a 50 KB RAM lower bound, Encore! executes Rocq-extracted code end-to-end, stays within the target memory budget on our benchmarks, and validates a transaction-signing application on physical Ledger Flex hardware.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2026

Practical Range Refinement Types with Inference

Refinement types are a static verification technique that aims at increasing the expressivity of traditional type systems while remaining easy and natural to use. While systems based on refinement types have been developed for several mainstream languages, their practical adoption remains limited by their annotation overhead, which is often a more significant burden than when using the "plain" type annotations of languages like Java or Scala. To improve the state of the art, this paper introduces Ranger: a refinement type system designed to keep the annotation overhead small and to seamlessly integrate with imperative-style constructs like variables and loops. As the name suggests, Ranger focuses on integer range types: a particular kind of refinement types that express bounded integer ranges. Such types are widely useful to verify correct index manipulation and in-bounds data accesses, among others. To combine expressiveness and succinctness, Ranger is based on a bidirectional type system, which runs a type inference algorithm to provide the typechecking pass with information useful to reduce the need for user-written auxiliary annotations. Ranger also integrates other forms of lightweight flow-sensitive static analysis techniques that precisely capture the program's behavior without explicit annotations. We implemented Ranger on top of the Licorne experimental programming language. Our experiments show that Ranger's implementation can concisely express and verify a variety of useful properties that fall beyond the capabilities of standard static type systems like those of Java and Scala, and that Ranger compares favorably to other extended type systems, such as the Java Checker Framework and Liquid Java, that can also check properties about ranges.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2026

Djinnlang: Higher-Level Programming by Unambiguous Specification with an LLM in the Compiler

Programmers write formal specifications, and LLMs implement them, proving that each implementation matches its spec. Taken to its extreme, this makes specification languages the new programming languages. We argue that an unambiguity constraint is key: in addition to proving that its implementation satisfies the specification, the LLM must also prove that any other implementation satisfying it must produce the same outputs on the same inputs, i.e. that the relation formed by the constraints is deterministic. This leaves the LLM no leeway on program semantics: as with a conventional compiler, the generated code never needs to be read and can be regenerated from the spec at any time. Under this constraint and with a powerful LLM, the difference between a specification language and a programming language becomes essentially meaningless, and the LLM essentially becomes a part of the compiler toolchain. The arrangement doubles as a strong form of AI control: an untrusted model writes the code, yet its work is tightly checked by a verifier. To demonstrate that our LLM-in-the-compiler paradigm is feasible when supported by our unambiguity constraint, we present Djinnlang, a high-level specification language built for this future. A Djinnlang program consists only of specifications --- the programmer never writes executable code. In place of a traditional compiler, a symbolic translator lowers each spec to Dafny stubs and proof obligations, and a driver harness orchestrates an LLM that fills in implementations and proofs, all checked by the Dafny verifier. We evaluate our language and implementation on multiple examples and we show that it is self-hosting: an LLM can implement the Djinnlang translator from its specification and the reimplementation can verify itself.

cs.PL↗