Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2010.01457

Privately Answering Counting Queries with Generalized Gaussian Mechanisms

Abstract

We consider the problem of answering $k$ counting (i.e. sensitivity-1) queries about a database with $(\epsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy. We give a mechanism such that if the true answers to the queries are the vector $d$, the mechanism outputs answers $\tilde{d}$ with the $\ell_\infty$-error guarantee: $$\mathcal{E}\left[||\tilde{d} - d||_\infty\right] = O\left(\frac{\sqrt{k \log \log \log k \log(1/\delta)}}{\epsilon}\right).$$ This reduces the multiplicative gap between the best known upper and lower bounds on $\ell_\infty$-error from $O(\sqrt{\log \log k})$ to $O(\sqrt{\log \log \log k})$. Our main technical contribution is an analysis of the family of mechanisms of the following form for answering counting queries: Sample $x$ from a \textit{Generalized Gaussian}, i.e. with probability proportional to $\exp(-(||x||_p/\sigma)^p)$, and output $\tilde{d} = d + x$. This family of mechanisms offers a tradeoff between $\ell_1$ and $\ell_\infty$-error guarantees and may be of independent interest. For $p = O(\log \log k)$, this mechanism already matches the previous best known $\ell_\infty$-error bound. We arrive at our main result by composing this mechanism for $p = O(\log \log \log k)$ with the sparse vector mechanism, generalizing a technique of Steinke and Ullman.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Arun Ganesh, Jiazheng Zhao. 2020-10-04. Privately Answering Counting Queries with Generalized Gaussian Mechanisms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01457

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS