Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2010.06199

Toeplitz Momentary Symbols: definition, results, and limitations in the spectral analysis of Structured Matrices

Matthias Bolten·Sven-Erik Ekström·Isabella Furci·Stefano Serra-Capizzano
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A powerful tool for analyzing and approximating the singular values and eigenvalues of structured matrices is the theory of GLT sequences. By the GLT theory one can derive a function, which describes the singular value or the eigenvalue distribution of the sequence, the latter under precise assumptions. However, for small values of the matrix size of the considered sequence, the approximations may not be as good as it is desirable, since in the construction of the GLT symbol one disregards small norm and low-rank perturbations. On the other hand, LFA can be used to construct polynomial symbols in a similar manner for discretizations, where the geometric information is present, but the small norm perturbations are retained. The main focus of this paper is the introduction of the concept of sequence of "Toeplitz momentary symbols", associated with a given sequence of truncated Toeplitz-like matrices. We construct the symbol in the same way as in the GLT theory, but we keep the information of the small norm contributions. The low-rank contributions are still disregarded, and we give an idea on the reason why this is negligible in certain cases and why it is not in other cases, being aware that in presence of high nonnormality the same low-rank perturbation can produce a dramatic change in the eigenvalue distribution. Moreover, a difference with respect to the LFA symbols is that GLT symbols and Toeplitz momentary symbols are more general and are applicable to a larger class of matrices. We show the applicability of the approach which leads to higher accuracy in some cases when compared with the GLT symbol. Finally, since for many applications and their analysis it is often necessary to consider non-square Toeplitz matrices, we formalize and provide some useful definitions, applicable for non-square Toeplitz momentary symbols.

Explore related subjects

math.NAcs.NA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matthias Bolten, Sven-Erik Ekström, Isabella Furci, Stefano Serra-Capizzano. 2022-01-21. Toeplitz Momentary Symbols: definition, results, and limitations in the spectral analysis of Structured Matrices. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2022.06.017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How many continuous measurements are needed to learn a vector?

One can recover vectors from $\mathbb{R}^m$ with arbitrary precision, using only $\lceil \log_2(m)\rceil +1$ continuous measurements that are chosen adaptively. This surprising result is explained and discussed, and we present applications to infinite-dimensional approximation problems.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

IterativeCUR: Large Rank-Adaptive Approximation From a Small Recycled Sketch

The computation of accurate low-rank matrix approximations is central to improving the scalability of various techniques in machine learning, uncertainty quantification, and control. Traditionally, low-rank approximations are constructed using SVD-based approaches such as truncated SVD or Randomized SVD. Although these SVD approaches---especially Randomized SVD---have proven to be very computationally efficient, other low-rank approximation methods can offer even greater performance. One such approach is the CUR decomposition, which forms a low-rank approximation using direct row and column subsets of a matrix. Because CUR uses direct matrix subsets, it is also often better able to preserve native matrix structures like sparsity or non-negativity than SVD-based approaches and can facilitate data interpretation in many contexts. This paper introduces IterativeCUR, which draws on previous work in randomized numerical linear algebra to build a new algorithm that is highly competitive compared to prior work. IterativeCUR is adaptive in the sense that it takes as an input parameter the desired tolerance $ε$ and outputs (with arbitrarily high probability) an approximation of error bounded by $ε$, rather than requiring an a priori guess of the numerical rank. IterativeCUR typically runs significantly faster than both existing CUR algorithms and techniques such as Randomized SVD. Its asymptotic complexity is $\mathcal{O}(mn + (m+n)r^2)$ for an $m\times n$ matrix of output rank $r$. IterativeCUR relies on a single small sketch from the matrix that is successively downdated as the algorithm proceeds. We demonstrate through extensive experiments that IterativeCUR achieves up to $4\times$ speed-up over state-of-the-art pivoting-on-sketch approaches with no loss of accuracy, and up to $40\times$ speed-up over rank-adaptive randomized SVD approaches.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

Multigrid with Linear Storage Complexity

As the discretization error for the solution of a partial differential equation (PDE) decreases, the precision required to store the corresponding coefficients naturally increases. Storing the solution's finite element coefficients explicitly requires $\mathcal O(n \log n)$ bits of storage, where $n$ is the number of degrees of freedom (DoFs). This paper presents a full multigrid method to compute the solution in a compressed format that reduces the storage complexity of the solution and intermediate vectors to $\mathcal O(n)$ bits. This reduction allows a matrix-free implementation to solve elliptic PDEs with an overall linear space complexity. For problems limited by the memory capacity of current supercomputers, we expect a memory footprint reduction of about an order of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art mixed-precision methods. We demonstrate the applicability of our algorithm by solving two model problems. Depending on the PDE and polynomial degree, but irrespective of the problem size, the solution vector on the finest grid requires between 4 and 12 bits per DoF, and the residual and correction require 3 to 6 bits each. Additional data is stored on the coarse grids with modestly increasing bit widths toward coarser grids.

math.NA↗