Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2010.06856

Catastrophic health expenditure and inequalities -- a district level study of West Bengal

Abstract

In this study, I aimed to estimate the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure and analyze the extent of inequalities in out-of-pocket health expenditure and its decomposition according to gender, sector, religion and social groups of the households across Districts of West Bengal. I analysed health spending in West Bengal, using National Sample Survey 71st round pooled data suitably represented to estimate up to district level. We measured CHE at different thresholds when OOP in health expenditure. Gini Coefficients and its decomposition techniques were applied to assess the degree of inequality in OOP health expenditures and between different socio geographic factors across districts. The incidence of catastrophic payments varies considerably across districts. Only 14.1 percent population of West Bengal was covered under health coverage in 2014. The inequality in OOP health expenditure for West Bengal has been observed with gini coefficient of 0.67. Based on the findings from this analysis, more attention is needed on effective financial protection for people of West Bengal to promote fairness, with special focus on the districts with higher inequality. This study only provides the extent of CHE and inequality across Districts of West Bengal but the causality may be taken in future scope of study.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pijush Kanti Das. 2020-10-14. Catastrophic health expenditure and inequalities -- a district level study of West Bengal. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.06856

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Computing Endogenous Transformations in Processing Networks: A Dynamic Calibration Approach

Understanding how supply chains endogenously transform requires a parametric model of processing networks with non-neutral substitution elasticities. While the Cascaded CES production function provides a rigorous framework, dynamically calibrating its structural parameters from time-series data constitutes a highly non-convex inverse optimization problem. Since enforcing strict microeconomic concavity renders standard monolithic approaches computationally intractable, we propose a novel structure-exploiting algorithm to bypass this limitation. By leveraging the physical upstreamness topology of the network, our hybrid heuristic effectively breaks the curse of dimensionality inherent in economywide processing networks. Applying this framework to U.S. time-series data, we provide a scalable computational engine to fully endogenize complex supply-chain transformations, ultimately uncovering the elastic origins of asymmetric macroeconomic tail risks.

econ.GN

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Screening Out the Needy: The Effects of SNAP Work Requirements

We examine the effectiveness of work requirements as a screening device in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Work requirements for "able-bodied adults without dependents" were suspended after the Great Recession and gradually reinstated across counties and states in the 2010s. Using linked administrative SNAP and employment data from five states and a triple-differences design, we find that work requirements reduce SNAP participation by seven percent without increasing labor supply and disproportionately screen out low-income individuals. We develop a welfare framework to interpret these results and find that the social costs of work requirements exceed budget savings.

econ.GN