Achieving a quantum smart workforce

Clarice D. Aiello; D. D. Awschalom; Hannes Bernien; Tina Brower-Thomas; Kenneth R. Brown; Todd A. Brun; Justin R. Caram; Eric Chitambar; Rosa Di Felice; Michael F. J. Fox; Stephan Haas; Alexander W. Holleitner; Eric R. Hudson; Jeffrey H. Hunt; Robert Joynt; Scott Koziol; H. J. Lewandowski; Douglas T. McClure; Jens Palsberg; Gina Passante; Kristen L. Pudenz; Christopher J. K. Richardson; Jessica L. Rosenberg; R. S. Ross; Mark Saffman; M. Singh; David W. Steuerman; Chad Stark; Jos Thijssen; A. Nick Vamivakas; James D. Whitfield; Benjamin M. Zwickl

doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abfa64

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2010.13778

Achieving a quantum smart workforce

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Interest in building dedicated Quantum Information Science and Engineering (QISE) education programs has greatly expanded in recent years. These programs are inherently convergent, complex, often resource intensive and likely require collaboration with a broad variety of stakeholders. In order to address this combination of challenges, we have captured ideas from many members in the community. This manuscript not only addresses policy makers and funding agencies (both public and private and from the regional to the international level) but also contains needs identified by industry leaders and discusses the difficulties inherent in creating an inclusive QISE curriculum. We report on the status of eighteen post-secondary education programs in QISE and provide guidance for building new programs. Lastly, we encourage the development of a comprehensive strategic plan for quantum education and workforce development as a means to make the most of the ongoing substantial investments being made in QISE.

Explore related subjects

physics.ed-ph cs.ET cs.GL quant-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Clarice D. Aiello, D. D. Awschalom, Hannes Bernien, Tina Brower-Thomas, Kenneth R. Brown, Todd A. Brun, Justin R. Caram, Eric Chitambar, Rosa Di Felice, Michael F. J. Fox, Stephan Haas, Alexander W. Holleitner, Eric R. Hudson, Jeffrey H. Hunt, Robert Joynt, Scott Koziol, H. J. Lewandowski, Douglas T. McClure, Jens Palsberg, Gina Passante, Kristen L. Pudenz, Christopher J. K. Richardson, Jessica L. Rosenberg, R. S. Ross, Mark Saffman, M. Singh, David W. Steuerman, Chad Stark, Jos Thijssen, A. Nick Vamivakas, James D. Whitfield, Benjamin M. Zwickl. 2020-10-23. Achieving a quantum smart workforce. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565%2Fabfa64

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Johann Bernoulli's analysis of elastic collisions (a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law thereby inspired)

In order to explain an elastic collision, Johann Bernoulli considered two bodies connected by a spring. Motion is defined as a succession of states of rest. Then, considering the spring to be a lever with a body at each extremity, the laws of equilibrium imply that `motion' is described by the time variation of the (common) quantity of motion of the bodies; the dynamic law is thus deduced. This inspires a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law (in one dimension) in introductory physics course; we call it ``bernoullian sequence''.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

Design and Initial Evaluation of a Photovoltaics-focused Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience in Physics

Traditional physics laboratory courses often focus on experiments with well-known results, limiting students' engagement in authentic scientific practices. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), where students engage in real research with unknown outcomes, have been shown to support positive student outcomes, such as increased self-efficacy, persistence, and engagement in scientific practices. However, discipline-specific studies of CUREs in physics remain limited. We describe the development, structure, and initial implementation of a photovoltaics-focused CURE in a second-year undergraduate physics laboratory course at the University of Colorado Boulder. To examine how students experienced the course, we analyzed end-of-semester reflection assignments using the five CURE components (i.e., scientific practices, discovery, relevance, collaboration, and iteration), as well as established dimensions of research authenticity, as analytic frameworks. Students described experiences associated with all five CURE components, with collaboration, relevance, and scientific practices appearing most prominently in their reflections. Students also associated authentic research with meaningful scientific contribution, engagement in authentic scientific practices, and navigating the uncertainty and setbacks inherent in research, although fewer explicitly identified themselves as researchers or scientists. A subset of students additionally connected the course to their immediate thinking about future academic and professional pathways. This work contributes both a discipline-specific model for implementing CUREs in experimental physics laboratory courses and provides insight into how students interpret and experience authentic research within this course context.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

A Workshop Series for Effective Use of AI in Uncertain Times: Building a Physics Faculty Learning Community

Generative AI tools are being widely taken up by students in their physics courses and beyond, often before instructors and institutions can develop policies and effective approaches for the use of these tools. Building on a framework for change in the era of AI, we developed and implemented a faculty learning community to help a university physics department address these challenges collectively. Over six biweekly sessions, faculty worked through course policies, classroom conversations about AI, AI-integrated coursework tasks, and assessment. Each session shared a common structure: we presented local data and department-sourced materials, tested them in small groups, and discussed them together, emphasizing durable pedagogical approaches over specific tools and platforms, and leading with evidence of students' own AI use. The series produced a shared, evolving repository of resources for faculty to draw on. This workshop provides an adaptable, theoretically informed model for a faculty learning community that departments can build on.

physics.ed-ph↗