Speed-Robust Scheduling -- Sand, Bricks, and Rocks

Franziska Eberle; Ruben Hoeksma; Nicole Megow; Lukas Nölke; Kevin Schewior; Bertrand Simon

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2011.05181

Speed-Robust Scheduling -- Sand, Bricks, and Rocks

Franziska Eberle·Ruben Hoeksma·Nicole Megow·Lukas Nölke·Kevin Schewior·Bertrand Simon

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The speed-robust scheduling problem is a two-stage problem where given $m$ machines, jobs must be grouped into at most $m$ bags while the processing speeds of the given $m$ machines are unknown. After the speeds are revealed, the grouped jobs must be assigned to the machines without being separated. To evaluate the performance of algorithms, we determine upper bounds on the worst-case ratio of the algorithm's makespan and the optimal makespan given full information. We refer to this ratio as the robustness factor. We give an algorithm with a robustness factor $2-1/m$ for the most general setting and improve this to $1.8$ for equal-size jobs. For the special case of infinitesimal jobs, we give an algorithm with an optimal robustness factor equal to $e/(e-1) \approx 1.58$. The particular machine environment in which all machines have either speed $0$ or $1$ was studied before by Stein and Zhong (SODA 2019). For this setting, we provide an algorithm for scheduling infinitesimal jobs with an optimal robustness factor of $(1+\sqrt{2})/2 \approx 1.207$. It lays the foundation for an algorithm matching the lower bound of $4/3$ for equal-size jobs.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Franziska Eberle, Ruben Hoeksma, Nicole Megow, Lukas Nölke, Kevin Schewior, Bertrand Simon. 2020-11-10. Speed-Robust Scheduling -- Sand, Bricks, and Rocks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.05181

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗