Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2012.14764

Dosimetric investigation of 103Pd permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy based on Monte Carlo calculations

Stephen G. Deering·Michelle Hilts·Deidre Batchelar·Juanita Crook·Rowan M. Thomson
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: Permanent breast seed implant (PBSI) using 103Pd is emerging as an effective adjuvant radiation technique for early-stage breast cancer. However, clinical dose evaluations follow the water-based TG-43 approach with its considerable approximations. Towards clinical adoption of advanced TG-186 model-based dose evaluations, this study presents a comprehensive investigation for PBSI considering both target and normal tissue doses. METHODS: Dose calculations are performed with the free open-source Monte Carlo (MC) code, egs_brachy, using 2 types of virtual patient models: TG43sim (simulated TG-43 conditions: all water with no interseed attenuation) and MCref (heterogeneous tissue modelling from patient CT, interseed attenuation, seeds at implant angle) for 35 patients. Sensitivity of dose metrics to seed orientation and the threshold for glandular/adipose tissue segmentation are assessed. RESULTS: In the target volume, D90 is 14.1% lower with MCref than with TG43sim, on average. Conversely, normal tissue doses are generally higher with MCref than with TG43sim, e.g., by 22% for skin D1cm2, 82% for ribs Dmax, and 71% for heart D1cm3. Discrepancies between MCref and TG43sim doses vary over the patient cohort, as well as with the tissue and metric considered. Doses are sensitive to the glandular/adipose tissue segmentation threshold with differences of a few percent in target D90. Skin doses are sensitive to seed orientation. CONCLUSIONS: TG-43 dose evaluations generally underestimate doses to critical normal organs/tissues while overestimating target doses. There is considerable variation in MCref and TG43sim on a patient-by-patient basis, suggesting that clinical adoption of patient-specific MC dose calculations is motivated. The MCref framework presented herein provides a consistent modelling approach for clinical implementation of advanced TG-186 dose calculations.

Explore related subjects

physics.med-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stephen G. Deering, Michelle Hilts, Deidre Batchelar, Juanita Crook, Rowan M. Thomson. 2020-12-29. Dosimetric investigation of 103Pd permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy based on Monte Carlo calculations. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.12.009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A digital-twin framework for forecasting treatment-day imaging with contour uncertainty in adaptive proton radiotherapy

Head-and-neck anatomy changes over a six-to-seven-week proton course, and the anatomy of a later week cannot be imaged when the plan is made. We present a digital-twin framework that forecasts a patient's treatment-day anatomy as an ensemble of predicted CTs with propagated contours and quantifies the uncertainty of the forecast contours. The twin is a library of previously treated patients with planning and weekly quality-assurance CTs (QACTs), made patient-specific by a two-step foundation-model deformable registration: a cross-patient field carries each library patient onto the current patient, and a longitudinal field, estimated in the current patient's frame, carries that patient's planning-to-QACT change onto the current patient's own planning CT. A library of 302 observations from 88 patients yields about 300 replicates per patient, each a deformation that occurred in a treated patient. The dispersion of the propagated contours, resolved by outward normal, is six-direction contour uncertainty in millimeters. This is uncertainty in the input to the forecast, which library patient the current patient follows, rather than in model parameters, and it is unchanged when the registration engine is exchanged. On ten patients with clinician contours on two QACTs, the library alone fixes the anisotropic shape of the uncertainty (4.5 to 6.2 mm); the first QACT narrows it by a factor of 3.2 to 3.6 without a contour being drawn; an approved contour improves the center but not the width. The estimate orders directions correctly but is not Gaussian-calibrated. A clinical target volume expansion is worked out as one application.

physics.med-ph↗
arXiv2026

On phase aberration estimation using common mid-angle speckle correlations

Phase aberrations, despite degrading ultrasound images, also encode valuable information about the spatial distribution of the speed of sound in tissue. In pulse-echo ultrasound, we can quantify them by exploiting speckle correlations. Among existing strategies, correlations between steered acquisitions that share a common mid-angle have proven particularly effective for inferring the speed of sound. Their phases can be linearly related to the phase aberrations undergone by both the incident and reflected wavefronts. This relationship has so far been demonstrated only through geometric arguments based on point reflectors. Here, we develop a rigorous theoretical formalism that extends this relationship to the speckle regime, completing the previously established linear model and clarifying its underlying assumptions. More importantly, we build on this formalism to analyze correlation-phase fluctuations arising from aberration-induced speckle decorrelation. The analysis reveals that phase variance is governed by the relative loss of coherence, which increases approximately linearly with the square of the correlation phases. Local correlation-phase estimates therefore become increasingly uncertain as their magnitude grows. Experimental measurements in a uniform tissue-mimicking phantom show excellent agreement with the predicted variance. Beyond providing a theoretical basis for advancing speed-of-sound imaging, this formalism establishes the accuracy limit of common-mid-angle correlation phases, offering a benchmark for evaluating more advanced aberration-estimation techniques.

physics.med-ph↗
arXiv2026

Buccal-Lingual Analysis and Inflammation Tracking in Oral Soft Tissues Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Preclinical Study

Four out of 10 adults aged 30 years or older in the USA are impacted by periodontal diseases which span a spectrum of inflammatory conditions. Currently, a subjective, invasive and a semi-quantitative approach, termed bleeding on probing, is employed in clinics for inflammation assessment. The long-term goal of this study is to fill the current clinical diagnostic gap in dentistry by proposing quantitative ultrasound (QUS)-based biomarkers for inflammation diagnosis and monitoring. Here, as one of the early works in this area, we investigated two QUS parameters for characterizing periodontal inflammation in gingival tissues using a longitudinal preclinical porcine study: attenuation coefficient slope (ACS) and backscatter intensity (BSI). Our study included eight pigs imaged intraorally (24 MHz) at four bi-weekly timepoints from week 0 (healthy) to week 6 (post inflammation inoculation) at their interproximal sites of the third premolars (PM3-Mes) from all quadrants. Moreover, we compared gingival tissues surrounding a tooth at lingual/palatal side versus buccal side at the second molar (M2-Dis) in healthy condition. Our results showed that gingival ACS at all inflammation timepoints were significantly lower than healthy gingival ACS (1.69 \pm 0.53 dB/cm.MHz) using a mixed effect analysis (week 6: 1.08 \pm 0.25 dB/cm.MHz). Longitudinal comparison of BSI did not demonstrate any statistical significance. Gingival ACS and BSI at lingual/palatal versus buccal sides of M2-Dis did not exhibit any statistical significance. These ACSs were linearly correlated with R-squared = 0.89 and a correlation slope of 0.87. For BSI, Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated no difference in mean BSI, although variability was high. These findings highlight the promising potential of ultrasonography paired with QUS to complement current standard of care in dentistry.

physics.med-ph↗