Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2102.01590

Development and Simulation-based Testing of a 5G-Connected Intersection AEB System

Michael Khayyat·Stefano Arrigoni·Federico Cheli
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In Europe, 20% of road crashes occur at intersections. In recent years, evolving communication technologies are making V2V and V2I faster and more reliable; with such advancements, these crashes, as well as their economic cost, can be partially reduced. In this work, we concentrate on straight path intersection collisions. Connectivity-based algorithms relying on 5G technology and smart sensors are presented and compared to a commercial radar AEB logic in order to evaluate performances and effectiveness in collision avoidance or mitigation. The aforementioned novel safety systems are tested in a blind intersection and low adherence scenario. The first algorithm proposed is obtained by incorporating connectivity information to the original control scheme, while the second algorithm proposed is a novel control logic fully capable of utilizing also adherence estimation provided by smart sensors. Test results show an improvement in terms of safety for both the architecture and high prospects for future developments.

Explore related subjects

eess.SYcs.NIcs.ROcs.SY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael Khayyat, Stefano Arrigoni, Federico Cheli. 2021-02-02. Development and Simulation-based Testing of a 5G-Connected Intersection AEB System. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2021.1998558

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Learning State-Action Control Barrier Functions for Model-Free Control under Constraints

Ensuring constraint satisfaction for learning-based control is a critical challenge, especially in the model-free case. While safety filters address this challenge in the model-based setting, they typically rely on predictive models derived from physics or data. This reliance limits their applicability for advanced model-free learning control methods. To address this gap, we propose a new optimization-based control framework that determines safe control inputs directly from data. The benefit of the framework is that both the objective function and the safety constraint can be updated using model-free learning algorithms, enabling performance optimization while maintaining safety. As a key component, the concept of direct data-driven safety filters (3DSF) is first proposed. The framework employs a novel safety certificate, called the state-action control barrier function (SACBF). We present two approaches for synthesizing SACBFs, including learning from an expert controller and reinforcement learning. We develop a robustness framework that guarantees safety and recursive feasibility for the expert-guided approach under learning errors. The proposed control framework bridges the gap between model-free learning-based control and constrained control, by decoupling performance optimization from safety enforcement. Simulations on vehicle control illustrate the superior performance regarding constraint satisfaction and task achievement compared to model-based methods and reward shaping.

eess.SY↗
arXiv2026

Safety Under State Uncertainty: Robustifying Control Barrier Functions

Safety-critical control is a crucial aspect of modern systems, and Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) have gained popularity as the framework of choice for ensuring safety. However, implementing a CBF requires exact knowledge of the true state, a requirement that is often violated in real-world applications where only noisy or estimated state information is available. This paper introduces the notion of Robust Control Barrier Functions (R-CBF) for ensuring safety under such state uncertainty. Crucially, this framework does not require knowledge of the magnitude of uncertainty for the synthesis of a robust safe controller. We formally characterize the class of robustifying terms that ensure robust closed-loop safety and show how a robustly safe controller can be constructed. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through simulations and compare it to existing methods, highlighting the additional robustness and convergence guarantees it provides.

eess.SY↗
arXiv2026

Model Predictive Control with Multiple Constraint Horizons

We propose a Model Predictive Control (MPC) formulation for nonlinear systems without terminal penalty or dedicated stabilizing terminal set, in which state constraints are enforced heterogeneously along the prediction horizon. In this setting a control-invariant set certifies near-term safety, while a less restrictive set constrains later predictions. This structure is motivated by safety-critical formulations, such as Control Barrier Function (CBF) based MPC, collision avoidance, and robotic receding-horizon planning, where near-term predictions must be certified safe and later predictions can be re-certified in future updates. We develop a value-function-difference analysis separating the effects of constraint-set selection and prediction-horizon length on closed-loop performance bounds, yielding implicit suboptimality certificates. Assuming cost-controllability, we further propose an upper-bound certificate which accounts explicitly for distinct constraint sets, their associated decay rates, and horizons. We also provide a lower-bound certificate for the closed-loop cost beyond the finite-horizon open-loop cost, which, for the admissible parameter range, is not weaker than the standard finite-horizon bound. Simulations on linear and nonlinear safety-critical systems demonstrate the proposed certificates \textit{a priori} and \textit{a posteriori}.

eess.SY↗