Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2102.03700

A procedure for automated tree pruning suggestion using LiDAR scans of fruit trees

Fredrik Westling·James Underwood·Mitch Bryson
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In fruit tree growth, pruning is an important management practice for preventing overcrowding, improving canopy access to light and promoting regrowth. Due to the slow nature of agriculture, decisions in pruning are typically made using tradition or rules of thumb rather than data-driven analysis. Many existing algorithmic, simulation-based approaches rely on high-fidelity digital captures or purely computer-generated fruit trees, and are unable to provide specific results on an orchard scale. We present a framework for suggesting pruning strategies on LiDAR-scanned commercial fruit trees using a scoring function with a focus on improving light distribution throughout the canopy. A scoring function to assess the quality of the tree shape based on its light availability and size was developed for comparative analysis between trees, and was validated against yield characteristics, demonstrating a reasonable correlation against fruit count with an $R^2$ score of 0.615 for avocado and 0.506 for mango. A tool was implemented for simulating pruning by algorithmically estimating which parts of a tree point cloud would be removed given specific cut points using structural analysis of the tree, validated experimentally with an average F1 score of 0.78 across 144 experiments. Finally, new pruning locations were suggested and we used the previous two stages to estimate the improvement of the tree given these suggestions. The light distribution was improved by up to 25.15\%, demonstrating a 16\% improvement over commercial pruning on a real tree, and certain cut points were discovered which improved light distribution with a smaller negative impact on tree volume. The final results suggest value in the framework as a decision making tool for commercial growers, or as a starting point for automated pruning since the entire process can be performed with little human intervention.

Explore related subjects

cs.CVeess.IV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fredrik Westling, James Underwood, Mitch Bryson. 2021-02-07. A procedure for automated tree pruning suggestion using LiDAR scans of fruit trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.03700

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV↗