arXiv · 2102.06406
A Too-Good-to-be-True Prior to Reduce Shortcut Reliance
Abstract
Despite their impressive performance in object recognition and other tasks under standard testing conditions, deep networks often fail to generalize to out-of-distribution (o.o.d.) samples. One cause for this shortcoming is that modern architectures tend to rely on "shortcuts" - superficial features that correlate with categories without capturing deeper invariants that hold across contexts. Real-world concepts often possess a complex structure that can vary superficially across contexts, which can make the most intuitive and promising solutions in one context not generalize to others. One potential way to improve o.o.d. generalization is to assume simple solutions are unlikely to be valid across contexts and avoid them, which we refer to as the too-good-to-be-true prior. A low-capacity network (LCN) with a shallow architecture should only be able to learn surface relationships, including shortcuts. We find that LCNs can serve as shortcut detectors. Furthermore, an LCN's predictions can be used in a two-stage approach to encourage a high-capacity network (HCN) to rely on deeper invariant features that should generalize broadly. In particular, items that the LCN can master are downweighted when training the HCN. Using a modified version of the CIFAR-10 dataset in which we introduced shortcuts, we found that the two-stage LCN-HCN approach reduced reliance on shortcuts and facilitated o.o.d. generalization.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Nikolay Dagaev, Brett D. Roads, Xiaoliang Luo, Daniel N. Barry, Kaustubh R. Patil, Bradley C. Love. 2021-02-12. A Too-Good-to-be-True Prior to Reduce Shortcut Reliance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06406
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.