Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2102.06975

Effect of cellular rearrangement time delays on the rheology of vertex models for confluent tissues

Abstract

Large-scale tissue deformation during biological processes such as morphogenesis requires cellular rearrangements. The simplest rearrangement in confluent cellular monolayers involves neighbor exchanges among four cells, called a T1 transition, in analogy to foams. But unlike foams, cells must execute a sequence of molecular processes, such as endocytosis of adhesion molecules, to complete a T1 transition. Such processes could take a long time compared to other timescales in the tissue. In this work, we incorporate this idea by augmenting vertex models to require a fixed, finite time for T1 transitions, which we call the "T1 delay time". We study how variations in T1 delay time affect tissue mechanics, by quantifying the relaxation time of tissues in the presence of T1 delays and comparing that to the cell-shape based timescale that characterizes fluidity in the absence of any T1 delays. We show that the molecular-scale T1 delay timescale dominates over the cell shape-scale collective response timescale when the T1 delay time is the larger of the two. We extend this analysis to tissues that become anisotropic under convergent extension, finding similar results. Moreover, we find that increasing the T1 delay time increases the percentage of higher-fold coordinated vertices and rosettes, and decreases the overall number of successful T1s, contributing to a more elastic-like -- and less fluid-like -- tissue response. Our work suggests that molecular mechanisms that act as a brake on T1 transitions could stiffen global tissue mechanics and enhance rosette formation during morphogenesis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gonca Erdemci-Tandogan, M. Lisa Manning. 2021-04-18. Effect of cellular rearrangement time delays on the rheology of vertex models for confluent tissues. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009049

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Rapid prediction of organisation in engineered corneal, glial and fibroblast tissues using machine learning and biophysical models

We present a machine learning approach for predicting the organisation of corneal, glial and fibroblast cells in 3D cultures used for tissue engineering. Our machine-learning-based method uses a generative adversarial network architecture called pix2pix, which we train using results from biophysical contractile network dipole orientation (CONDOR) simulations. In the following, we refer to the machine learning method as the RAPTOR (RApid Prediction of Tissue ORganisation) approach. A training data set containing a range of CONDOR simulations is created, covering a range of underlying model parameters. Predictions of the trained neural network are compared with cultured glial, corneal, and fibroblast tissues, with good agreements for both CONDOR and RAPTOR approaches. An approach is developed to determine CONDOR model parameters for specific tissues using both RAPTOR and CONDOR fits to tissue properties. RAPTOR outputs a variety of tissue properties, including cell densities, cell alignments and tension. RAPTOR yields predictions of tissue properties within fractions of a second. This speed makes it valuable for the design of tethered moulds for tissue growth.

physics.bio-ph↗

How do incorrect ligands help detect a correct ligand?

Intrigued by the response of T cell receptors to the presence of a few agonist ligands, we propose a minimal model that can achieve similar performance. The model consists of a small cluster of immobile receptors that bind reversibly to two types (correct/incorrect) of ligands in the environment, with slightly weaker binding strength for the incorrect one. It features binding-state coupling between nearest-neighbor receptors, and receptors in the bound/free states are activated/deactivated by specific enzymes, with rates that allow kinetic proofreading. It is found that, for a range of binding-state coupling strength, incorrect ligands alone cannot activate the receptors, but the binding of merely one correct ligand to a receptor is sufficient to promote the activation of other receptors via induced binding to incorrect ligands. Both response time and signal amplification increase as the receptor binding-state coupling strength increases until it reaches an optimal range to achieve the most rapid and sensitive response. These results suggest a possible mechanism for a speedy and specific response of receptors to very few correct ligands in biological and artificial systems at the subcellular scale.

physics.bio-ph↗

Spatially Resolved Nucleated Polymerization: A Free-Boundary Model of Protein Aggregation in Concentrated Solutions

Kinetic models of protein aggregation describe populations by size, not by spatial organization or morphology. We extend Lumry-Eyring nucleated polymerization to a model in which the monomer is a density field and each aggregate is a region bounded by a level set. Growth is a flux condition on the available sites of a surface. Condensation is a reaction between the bonding sites of two surfaces in contact, at a rate set by the bond rate and the contact geometry. The availability of those sites is a field on the interface, and its equilibrium value follows from Wertheim's perturbation theory. The collision efficiency and the Fuchs stability ratio are therefore computed, not fitted. In a well-mixed limit the model's spatial averages satisfy the rate equations term by term; the monomer fraction agrees to eight parts in ten thousand, a difference that arises from equating aggregate size with volume. The condensation kernel's exponent is $0.5806\pm0.0013$ against the $0.600\pm0.010$ fitted to a monoclonal antibody. The computed stability ratio reproduces thirteen of fourteen published conditions at twelve $k_BT$, but only with the bond rate at the top of its range. In a many-body box, aggregates merge at $2.2$ to $3.8$ times the two-body rate.

physics.bio-ph↗