Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2103.04898

On Asymptotic Log-Optimal Buy-and-Hold Strategy

Chung-Han Hsieh
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a frequency-based portfolio optimization problem with $m \geq 2$ assets when the expected logarithmic growth (ELG) rate of wealth is used as the performance metric. With the aid of the notion called dominant asset, it is known that the optimal ELG level is achieved by investing all available funds on that asset. However, such an "all-in" strategy is arguably too risky to implement in practice. Motivated by this issue, we study the case where the portfolio weights are chosen in a rather ad-hoc manner and a buy-and-hold strategy is subsequently used. Then we show that, if the underlying portfolio contains a dominant asset, buy and hold on that specific asset is asymptotically log-optimal with a sublinear rate of convergence. This result also extends to the scenario where a trader either does not have a probabilistic model for the returns or does not trust a model obtained from historical data. To be more specific, we show that if a market contains a dominant asset, buy and hold a market portfolio involving nonzero weights for each asset is asymptotically log-optimal. Additionally, this paper also includes a conjecture regarding the property called high-frequency maximality. That is, in the absence of transaction costs, high-frequency rebalancing is unbeatable in the ELG sense. Support for the conjecture, involving a lemma for a weak version of the conjecture, is provided. This conjecture, if true, enables us to improve the log-optimality result obtained previously. Finally, a result that indicates a way regarding an issue about when should one to rebalance their portfolio if needed, is also provided. Examples, some involving simulations with historical data, are also provided along the way to illustrate the~theory.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.PMq-fin.CPq-fin.MF

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chung-Han Hsieh. 2021-03-08. On Asymptotic Log-Optimal Buy-and-Hold Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2023.110901

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Financially Guided Deep Portfolio Optimization

Portfolio optimization in real-world financial markets is notoriously difficult due to non-stationarity, noisy data, and high transaction costs. Standard predict-then-optimize methods first forecast returns and then solve for weights, compounding prediction errors and often failing under regime shifts. We propose an end-to-end framework that directly optimizes differentiable surrogates of key financial metrics (Sharpe ratio, Omega ratio, Conditional Value-at-Risk, and risk parity), allowing neural networks to learn portfolio weights via backpropagation. Our expanding-window walk-forward procedure, applied to 50 S&P 500 stocks from 2007 to 2023, incorporates realistic bid-ask spread costs and rebalances quarterly. On the challenging out-of-sample test period (2022-2023), the best model, an AttentionLSTM with the Omega-CVaR-RiskParity loss, achieves an annualized Sharpe of 0.29 and a total compounded return of +7.86%, while the S&P 500 delivers -4.52% total compounded return and an annualized Sharpe of -0.02. This outperforms the S&P 500 by 12.38 percentage points, while keeping tail risk (CVaR) nearly unchanged. The framework outperforms the equal-weight portfolio, S&P 500, and traditional methods (MVP, HRP, NCO, ERC), demonstrating that embedding financial objectives directly into model training yields robust, economically meaningful outperformance even in adverse market conditions.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

The geometry of higher order modern portfolio theory

In this article, we study the generalized modern portfolio theory, with utility functions admitting higher-order cumulants. We establish that under certain genericity conditions, the utility function has a constant number of complex critical points. We study the discriminant locus of complex critical points with multiplicity. Finally, we switch our attention to the generalization of the feasible portfolio set (variety), determine its dimension, and give a formula for its degree.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance

Special Markowitz (SM) regularises returns and covariance jointly, relative to a reference state (mu_ref, Sigma_ref). Each eigendirection of the whitened relative operator carries a signed spectral potential Phi_k, with persistence factor psi_k = exp(-Phi_k) > 0. Positive potentials attenuate empirical deviations from the reference geometry, zero potential preserves them, and negative potentials amplify them. The persistence factor psi_k governs both the return signal and the covariance deviation: the regularised deviation from the reference is psi_k times the empirical deviation. The logarithmic potential coordinate is characterised by a multiplicative composition law on the multiplicative group of positive real numbers; the Stein loss is characterised as the unique free-energy density (within a natural class) compatible with the resulting coupling. The SM pressure functional is additive across modes the defining property of Special Markowitz.

q-fin.PM↗