Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2103.07027

Robust Lower Bounds for Graph Problems in the Blackboard Model of Communication

Christian Konrad·Peter Robinson·Viktor Zamaraev
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We give lower bounds on the communication complexity of graph problems in the multi-party blackboard model. In this model, the edges of an $n$-vertex input graph are partitioned among $k$ parties, who communicate solely by writing messages on a shared blackboard that is visible to every party. We show that any non-trivial graph problem on $n$-vertex graphs has blackboard communication complexity $\Omega(n)$ bits, even if the edges of the input graph are randomly assigned to the $k$ parties. We say that a graph problem is non-trivial if the output cannot be computed in a model where every party holds at most one edge and no communication is allowed. Our lower bound thus holds for essentially all key graph problems relevant to distributed computing, including Maximal Independent Set (MIS), Maximal Matching, ($\Delta+1$)-coloring, and Dominating Set. In many cases, e.g., MIS, Maximal Matching, and $(\Delta+1)$-coloring, our lower bounds are optimal, up to poly-logarithmic factors.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Christian Konrad, Peter Robinson, Viktor Zamaraev. 2021-03-12. Robust Lower Bounds for Graph Problems in the Blackboard Model of Communication. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.07027

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗