Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2105.05565

$\texttt{RidgeSketch}$: A Fast sketching based solver for large scale ridge regression

Abstract

We propose new variants of the sketch-and-project method for solving large scale ridge regression problems. Firstly, we propose a new momentum alternative and provide a theorem showing it can speed up the convergence of sketch-and-project, through a fast $\textit{sublinear}$ convergence rate. We carefully delimit under what settings this new sublinear rate is faster than the previously known linear rate of convergence of sketch-and-project without momentum. Secondly, we consider combining the sketch-and-project method with new modern sketching methods such as the count sketch, subcount sketch (a new method we propose), and subsampled Hadamard transforms. We show experimentally that when combined with the sketch-and-project method, the (sub)count sketch is very effective on sparse data and the standard subsample sketch is effective on dense data. Indeed, we show that these sketching methods, combined with our new momentum scheme, result in methods that are competitive even when compared to the Conjugate Gradient method on real large scale data. On the contrary, we show the subsampled Hadamard transform does not perform well in this setting, despite the use of fast Hadamard transforms, and nor do recently proposed acceleration schemes work well in practice. To support all of our experimental findings, and invite the community to validate and extend our results, with this paper we are also releasing an open source software package: $\texttt{RidgeSketch}$. We designed this object-oriented package in Python for testing sketch-and-project methods and benchmarking ridge regression solvers. $\texttt{RidgeSketch}$ is highly modular, and new sketching methods can easily be added as subclasses. We provide code snippets of our package in the appendix.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nidham Gazagnadou, Mark Ibrahim, Robert M. Gower. 2021-05-26. $\texttt{RidgeSketch}$: A Fast sketching based solver for large scale ridge regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05565

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Dynamic Programming-Compatible Uncertainty Sets in Robust Markov Decision Processes

In this paper, we investigate the compatibility of robust Markov Decision Processes (RMDPs) with dynamic programming under various assumptions on the uncertainty set, i.e., we investigate when one can solve an RMDP by solving a fixed point equation. We show that in all generality, s-rectangular and sa-rectangular uncertainty sets are the only models of uncertainty that are compatible with dynamic programming. Our analysis shows that existing non-rectangular models, including r-rectangularity, are only weakly compatible with dynamic programming, as they require the assumption that rewards do not depend on the next state. In this case, our results imply that one can always construct a rectangular uncertainty set that is equivalent, for both policy evaluation and optimization, to the dynamic programming-compatible non-rectangular model. This highlights a key limitation: dynamic-programming-compatible non-rectangular uncertainty sets, although practically relevant for uncertainty quantification, do not provide a genuinely distinct assessment of policy performance. Interestingly, our proof techniques rely on identifying a novel simultaneous solvability property, which we show is central to several important properties of RMDPs, including the existence of stationary optimal policies and dynamic programming-based formulations. The simultaneous solvability property enables a unified approach to studying all existing models of uncertainty, rectangular and non-rectangular alike.

math.OC

A simple and practical adaptive trust-region method

We present an adaptive trust-region method for unconstrained optimization that allows inexact solutions to the trust-region subproblems. Our method is a simple variant of the classical trust-region method of Ssorensen. The method achieves the best possible convergence bound up to an additive logarithmic term for finding an $ε$-approximate stationary point, i.e., $O( Δ_f L^{1/2} ε^{-3/2}) + \tilde{O}(1)$ iterations, where $L$ is the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian, $Δ_f$ is the optimality gap, and $ε$ is the termination tolerance for the gradient norm. This improves over existing trust-region methods whose worst-case bound is at least a factor of $L$ worse. We compare our performance with state-of-the-art trust-region (TRU) and cubic regularization (ARC) methods from the GALAHAD library on the CUTEst benchmark problems with at least 100 variables. We also compare with the recently developed Universal trust-region (UTR) method, using the same subproblem solver. In terms of shifted geometric mean of wall-clock times our method's is between $1.2\times$ and $2\times$ faster. We report similar improvements for number of function evaluations, factorizations, gradient evaluations and Hessian evaluations. Compared to the conference version of this paper, our revised method includes several practical enhancements. These modifications dramatically improved performance, including almost an order of magnitude reduction in the shifted geometric mean of wall-clock times. We also show that it suffices for the function to be continuously twice-differentiable to guarantee that either the minimum gradient norm converges to zero or the objective value tends towards negative infinity, even when the iterates diverge.

math.OC

Rough Stochastic Pontryagin Maximum Principle and an Indirect Shooting Method

We derive first-order Pontryagin optimality conditions for stochastic optimal control with deterministic controls for systems modeled by rough differential equations (RDE) driven by Gaussian rough paths. This Pontryagin Maximum Principle (PMP) applies to systems following stochastic differential equations (SDE) driven by Brownian motion, yet it does not rely on forward-backward SDEs and involves the same Hamiltonian as the deterministic PMP. The proof consists of first deriving various integrable error bounds for solutions to nonlinear and linear RDEs by leveraging recent results on Gaussian rough paths. The PMP then follows using standard techniques based on needle-like variations. As an application, we propose the first indirect shooting method for nonlinear stochastic optimal control and show that it converges 10x faster than a direct method on a stabilization task.

math.OC