Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2105.08972

Efficient sequential PLIC interface positioning for enhanced performance of the three-phase VoF Method

Johannes Kromer·Johanna Potyka·Kathrin Schulte·Dieter Bothe
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper presents an efficient algorithm for the sequential positioning, also called nested dissection, of two planes in an arbitrary polyhedron. Two planar interfaces are positioned such that the first plane truncates a given volume from this arbitrary polyhedron and the next plane truncates a second given volume from the residual polyhedron. This is a relevant task in the numerical simulation of three-phase flows when resorting to the geometric Volume-of-Fluid (VoF) method with a Piecewise Linear Interface Calculation (PLIC). An efficient algorithm for this task significantly speeds up the three-phase PLIC algorithm. The present study describes a method based on a recursive application of the Gaussian divergence theorem, where the fact that the truncated polyhedron shares multiple faces with the original polyhedron can be exploited to reduce the computational effort. A careful choice of the coordinate system origin for the volume computation allows for successive positioning of two planes without reestablishing polyhedron connectivity. Combined with a highly efficient root finding, this results in a significant performance gain in the reconstruction of the three-phase interface configurations. The performance of the new method is assessed in a series of carefully designed numerical experiments. Compared to a conventional decomposition-based approach, the number of iterations and, thus, of the required truncations was reduced by up to an order of magnitude. The PLIC positioning run-time was reduced by about 90% in our reference implementation. Integrated into the multi-phase flow solver Free Surface 3D (FS3D), an overall performance gain of about 20% was achieved. Allowing for simple integration into existing numerical schemes, the proposed algorithm is self-contained (example Fortran Module see https://doi.org/10.18419/darus-2488), requiring no external decomposition libraries.

Explore related subjects

math.NAcs.CEcs.NAphysics.comp-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Johannes Kromer, Johanna Potyka, Kathrin Schulte, Dieter Bothe. 2023-06-27. Efficient sequential PLIC interface positioning for enhanced performance of the three-phase VoF Method. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.106051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How many continuous measurements are needed to learn a vector?

One can recover vectors from $\mathbb{R}^m$ with arbitrary precision, using only $\lceil \log_2(m)\rceil +1$ continuous measurements that are chosen adaptively. This surprising result is explained and discussed, and we present applications to infinite-dimensional approximation problems.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

IterativeCUR: Large Rank-Adaptive Approximation From a Small Recycled Sketch

The computation of accurate low-rank matrix approximations is central to improving the scalability of various techniques in machine learning, uncertainty quantification, and control. Traditionally, low-rank approximations are constructed using SVD-based approaches such as truncated SVD or Randomized SVD. Although these SVD approaches---especially Randomized SVD---have proven to be very computationally efficient, other low-rank approximation methods can offer even greater performance. One such approach is the CUR decomposition, which forms a low-rank approximation using direct row and column subsets of a matrix. Because CUR uses direct matrix subsets, it is also often better able to preserve native matrix structures like sparsity or non-negativity than SVD-based approaches and can facilitate data interpretation in many contexts. This paper introduces IterativeCUR, which draws on previous work in randomized numerical linear algebra to build a new algorithm that is highly competitive compared to prior work. IterativeCUR is adaptive in the sense that it takes as an input parameter the desired tolerance $ε$ and outputs (with arbitrarily high probability) an approximation of error bounded by $ε$, rather than requiring an a priori guess of the numerical rank. IterativeCUR typically runs significantly faster than both existing CUR algorithms and techniques such as Randomized SVD. Its asymptotic complexity is $\mathcal{O}(mn + (m+n)r^2)$ for an $m\times n$ matrix of output rank $r$. IterativeCUR relies on a single small sketch from the matrix that is successively downdated as the algorithm proceeds. We demonstrate through extensive experiments that IterativeCUR achieves up to $4\times$ speed-up over state-of-the-art pivoting-on-sketch approaches with no loss of accuracy, and up to $40\times$ speed-up over rank-adaptive randomized SVD approaches.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

Multigrid with Linear Storage Complexity

As the discretization error for the solution of a partial differential equation (PDE) decreases, the precision required to store the corresponding coefficients naturally increases. Storing the solution's finite element coefficients explicitly requires $\mathcal O(n \log n)$ bits of storage, where $n$ is the number of degrees of freedom (DoFs). This paper presents a full multigrid method to compute the solution in a compressed format that reduces the storage complexity of the solution and intermediate vectors to $\mathcal O(n)$ bits. This reduction allows a matrix-free implementation to solve elliptic PDEs with an overall linear space complexity. For problems limited by the memory capacity of current supercomputers, we expect a memory footprint reduction of about an order of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art mixed-precision methods. We demonstrate the applicability of our algorithm by solving two model problems. Depending on the PDE and polynomial degree, but irrespective of the problem size, the solution vector on the finest grid requires between 4 and 12 bits per DoF, and the residual and correction require 3 to 6 bits each. Additional data is stored on the coarse grids with modestly increasing bit widths toward coarser grids.

math.NA↗