Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2105.08978

Contingent Penalty and Contingent Renewal Supply Contracts in High-Tech Industry

Mirjam S Meijer·Willem van Jaarsveld·Ton de Kok·Christopher S Tang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Unlike consumer goods industry, a high-tech manufacturer (OEM) often amortizes new product development costs over multiple generations, where demand for each generation is based on advance orders and additional uncertain demand. Also, due to economic reasons and regulations, high-tech OEMs usually source from a single supplier. Relative to the high retail price, the wholesale price for a supplier to produce high-tech components is low. Consequently, incentives are misaligned: the OEM faces relatively high under-stock costs and the supplier faces high over-stock costs. In this paper, we examine supply contracts that are intended to align the incentives between a high-tech OEM and a supplier so that the supplier will invest adequate and yet non-verifiable capacity to meet the OEM's uncertain demand. When focusing on a single generation, the manufacturer can coordinate a decentralized supply chain and extract all surplus by augmenting a traditional wholesale price contract with a "contingent penalty" should the supplier fail to fulfill the OEM's demand. When the resulting penalty is too high to be enforceable, we consider a new class of "contingent renewal" wholesale price contracts with a stipulation: the OEM will renew the contract with the incumbent supplier for the next generation only when the supplier can fulfill the demand for the current generation. By using non-renewal as an implicit penalty, we show that the contingent renewal contract can coordinate the supply chain. While the OEM can capture the bulk of the supply chain profit, this innovative contract cannot enable the OEM to extract the entire surplus.

Explore related subjects

math.OC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mirjam S Meijer, Willem van Jaarsveld, Ton de Kok, Christopher S Tang. 2021-05-19. Contingent Penalty and Contingent Renewal Supply Contracts in High-Tech Industry. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.08978

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AdGT: Decentralized Gradient Tracking with Adaptive Per-Agent Stepsizes

In decentralized optimization, gradient-tracking methods typically rely on a single global stepsize. This choice can be conservative when agents have local objectives with different smoothness constants, since the stepsize must remain stable for the agent with the largest smoothness constant. This paper proposes AdGT, a decentralized gradient-tracking method in which each agent adapts its own stepsize using local gradient variation and a single global safety factor. The method reduces fixed-stepsize tuning effort and allows agents to exploit local smoothness information during the iterations. For smooth and strongly convex local objectives over undirected networks, we prove that the analyzed AdGT update converges linearly to the exact consensus optimizer. We also study two adaptive stepsize updates that use changes in the gradient-tracking direction. We characterize when the corresponding candidate determines the stepsize and prove conditional lower and upper stepsize bounds and linear convergence under an additional relative tracking-disagreement condition. Experiments on logistic regression, ridge regression, synthetic quadratic problems, and a linear-regression benchmark against state-of-the-art decentralized solvers show that AdGT often reaches a given accuracy in fewer iterations or gradient evaluations than tuned fixed-stepsize GT and the tested baselines, especially under heterogeneous local smoothness. In the topology experiments, each tested AdGT update uses one common safety factor across all graphs, whereas the fixed GT stepsize is tuned separately for each graph and seed.

math.OC↗
arXiv2026

Brockett cost function for symplectic eigenvalues

The sum of symplectic eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of symmetric positive-definite matrices in the sense of Williamson's theorem can be computed via minimization of a trace cost function under the symplecticity constraint. Optimal solutions to this problem only offer a symplectic basis for the symplectic eigenspace corresponding to the sought symplectic eigenvalues. In this note, we introduce a Brockett cost function and investigate its properties and the connection with the symplectic eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the considered matrix. Specifically, we prove that any stationary point consists of symplectic eigenvectors, characterize the saddle points and global minimizers based on which the trace minimization theorem for the symplectic eigenvalues is re-established, and the nonexistence of local nonglobal minimizers is justified.

math.OC↗
arXiv2026

Riemannian Bilevel Optimization with Gradient Aggregation

We study bilevel optimization on Riemannian manifolds when the lower-level solution set is a positive-dimensional submanifold, so that implicit differentiation fails. We propose Riemannian Bilevel Descent Aggregation (RBDA), which extends bilevel descent aggregation to manifolds. Its inner loop aggregates the lower-level descent direction with the upper-level gradient under a decaying multiplier, and its hypergradient is the reverse-mode derivative of the unrolled loop. Under geodesic convexity and quadratic growth of the lower level, the inner iterates converge to a point of the optimistic solution set at a polynomial rate. Approximate minimizers of the objective with a finite number of inner iterations converge to minimizers of the optimistic value. In the experiments RBDA selects the optimistic solution where the implicit and unrolled estimators remain at the initial point or stop at a larger query loss. While each of its outer steps costs more than that of the unrolled estimator, it attains the highest test accuracy in data hyper-cleaning.

math.OC↗