Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2106.05602

Splittings and robustness for the Heine-Borel theorem

Abstract

The Heine-Borel theorem for uncountable coverings has recently emerged as an interesting and central principle in higher-order Reverse Mathematics and computability theory, formulated as follows: HBU is the Heine-Borel theorem for uncountable coverings given as $\cup_{x\in [0,1]}(x-Ψ(x), x+Ψ(x))$ for arbitrary $Ψ:[0,1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{+}$, i.e. the original formulation going back to Cousin (1895) and Lindelöf (1903). In this paper, we show that HBU is equivalent to its restriction to functions continuous almost everywhere, an elegant robustness result. We also obtain a nice splitting HBU $\leftrightarrow$ [WHBU$^{+}$+HBC$_{0}$ + WKL$_0]$ where WHBU$^{+}$ is a strengthening of Vitali's covering theorem and where HBC$_{0}$ is the Heine-Borel theorem for countable collections (and \textbf{not sequences}) of basic open intervals, as formulated by Borel himself in 1898.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sam Sanders. 2021-06-10. Splittings and robustness for the Heine-Borel theorem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05602

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO