Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2107.09233

Enumerating k-SAT functions

Abstract

How many $k$-SAT functions on $n$ boolean variables are there? What does a typical such function look like? Bollobás, Brightwell, and Leader conjectured that, for each fixed $k \ge 2$, the number of $k$-SAT functions on $n$ variables is $(1+o(1))2^{\binom{n}{k} + n}$, or equivalently: a $1-o(1)$ fraction of all $k$-SAT functions are unate, i.e., monotone after negating some variables. They proved a weaker version of the conjecture for $k=2$. The conjecture was confirmed for $k=2$ by Allen and $k=3$ by Ilinca and Kahn. We show that the problem of enumerating $k$-SAT functions is equivalent to a Turán density problem for partially directed hypergraphs. Our proof uses the hypergraph container method. Furthermore, we confirm the Bollobás--Brightwell--Leader conjecture for $k=4$ by solving the corresponding Turán density problem. Our solution applies a recent result of Füredi and Maleki on the minimum triangular edge density in a graph of given edge density. In an appendix (by Nitya Mani and Edward Yu), we further confirm the $k=5$ case of the conjecture via a brute force computer search.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dingding Dong, Nitya Mani, Yufei Zhao. 2022-04-25. Enumerating k-SAT functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.09233

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO