Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2108.03165

Well-posedness and optimal control for a Cahn-Hilliard-Oono system with control in the mass term

Abstract

The paper treats the problem of optimal distributed control of a Cahn-Hilliard-Oono system in $\mathbb{R}^d$, $1\leq d\leq 3$, with the control located in the mass term and admitting general potentials that include both the case of a regular potential and the case of some singular potential. The first part of the paper is concerned with the dependence of the phase variable on the control variable. In the case of a logarithmic potential, we need to prove an ad hoc strict separation property, and for this reason we have to restrict ourselves to the case $d = 2$. In the rest of the work, we study the necessary first-order optimality conditions, which are proved under suitable compatibility conditions on the initial datum of the phase variable and the time derivative of the control, at least in case of potentials having unbounded domain. PLEASE NOTE: A revised version of this paper has been published in Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 15 (2022), 2135-2172: the authors point out that both the published version and the arXiv preprint contain a trivial mistake in formula (2.21), which leads to suitable changes in the assumption (2.10) and in some occurrences of it. Namely, (2.21) and (2.10) become $ \bar φ(t) = \bar φ_0 e^{-t} + \int_0^t e^{-(t-s)} \bar u(s) \, ds$ for every $t\in[0,T]$, and $-M - (\barφ_0)^- , M + (\barφ_0)^+$ belong to the interior of $D(β)$, respectively. The formula just after (2.21) becomes $-M - (\barφ_0)^- \leq \bar φ(t) \leq M + (\barφ_0)^+$ and a similar change must be done in (4.20). The first line of (2.24) is now implied by the new (2.21). Next, (2.39) becomes $-(M+ R) - (\barφ_0)^- , (M+ R) + (\barφ_0)^+$ belong to the interior of $D(β)$. Similar changes must be done in the interval written just two lines before (4.18) and in (4.18) itself.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pierluigi Colli, Gianni Gilardi, Elisabetta Rocca, Jürgen Sprekels. 2022-06-01. Well-posedness and optimal control for a Cahn-Hilliard-Oono system with control in the mass term. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.03165

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Blow-Up Dynamics for the $L^2$ critical case of the $2$D Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation

We study blow-up dynamics for the $L^2$-critical cubic Zakharov--Kuznetsov equation in two dimensions, \[ \partial_tu+\partial_{x_1}(Δu+u^3)=0 \qquad\text{on }\mathbb R^2. \] For a class of localized $H^1$ perturbations of the ground state $Q$, we establish a trichotomy near the soliton manifold: exit from a small $L^2$-tube, global asymptotic stability, or finite-time blow-up. In the stable blow-up regime, the solution concentrates a single bubble and \[ λ(t)\sim \ell_0(T-t)^{1/(3-c)}, \] where $\ell_0>0$ depends on the initial datum and $c\in(1,2)$ is an explicit constant determined by the transverse tail of the first-order approximate profile. Consequently, \[ \|\nabla u(t)\|_{L^2} \sim \frac{\|\nabla Q\|_{L^2}} {\ell_0(T-t)^{1/(3-c)}}. \] After subtraction of the concentrating soliton, the radiation converges strongly in $L^p(\mathbb R^2)$ for every $2\leq p<\infty$ to a common nonzero profile $u^*$, while \[ u^*\notin H^s(\mathbb R^2) \qquad\text{for every }s\geq\frac c2. \] The stable blow-up branch is open in the relative $H^1$ topology of the localized class. Finally, every non-soliton datum in this class with non-positive energy blows up in finite time. Interval-arithmetic computer-assisted proofs certify the numerical inputs to the virial coercivity argument. They also yield a rigorous enclosure of $c$, justifying the polynomial moment of order $21$ imposed on the initial data.

math.AP

Propagation of wave packets close to conical intersections

In this paper, we study the propagation of wave packets close to conical intersections with respect to a system of two Schr{ö}dinger equations presenting a codimension 2 crossing. We focus on the dynamics that occur when the wave packets pass through an area close to the crossing, and our main results provide an explicit formula for the outgoing wave packet in terms of the incoming one, with a complete description of its phase and of the classical trajectories it follows, including a drift.

math.AP

A Volterra Calculus for Lie Groupoids

A pseudodifferential Volterra calculus for inverting parabolic differential equations on Lie groupoids is introduced. This enables the study of fundamental solutions of various cases of heat flows on singular manifolds with corners with non-resonant boundary indicial symbols, such as the $b$-manifolds, as well as other geometric bisection covariant heat flows. We also establish the short time asymptotic expansion for the heat kernel of a positive, elliptic differential operator on a Lie groupoid that acts on suitable Sobolev Hilbert modules and is positive definite with respect to the appropriate $L^2$ inner product.

math.AP