Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2108.07393

Theory Building in Geometry Education: Designing and implementing a course for 12-15 year old students

Madhav Kaushish
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

If we want mathematics education to be valuable to everybody, including those who do not pursue mathematics-related careers, we need to use mathematics as a training ground for certain ways of thinking. This dissertation focuses on one aspect of mathematical thinking, namely theory building. It has three parts - unpacking what constitutes theory building, the development of a course aimed at theory building, and a qualitative description of an implementation of that course with 12 to 15-year-old students in two schools in Pune, India. The description aims to understand some of how students engaged with the course and the role of the instructor in the implementation of the course. The data used in this description includes video recordings of the sessions, teacher reflections at the end of each session, and student reflections and feedback. The ultimate goal of the description is to suggest considerations we should keep in mind when designing and implementing theory-building courses. The focus of the dissertation is within mathematics, and more specifically, within geometry. However, this is hopefully just a first step towards a transdisciplinary framework aimed at developing thinking abilities useful to everybody in their personal, public, and professional lives.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Madhav Kaushish. 2021-08-17. Theory Building in Geometry Education: Designing and implementing a course for 12-15 year old students. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07393

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO↗