Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2108.10547

The complexity of testing all properties of planar graphs, and the role of isomorphism

Sabyasachi Basu·Akash Kumar·C. Seshadhri
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Consider property testing on bounded degree graphs and let $\varepsilon>0$ denote the proximity parameter. A remarkable theorem of Newman-Sohler (SICOMP 2013) asserts that all properties of planar graphs (more generally hyperfinite) are testable with query complexity only depending on $\varepsilon$. Recent advances in testing minor-freeness have proven that all additive and monotone properties of planar graphs can be tested in $poly(\varepsilon^{-1})$ queries. Some properties falling outside this class, such as Hamiltonicity, also have a similar complexity for planar graphs. Motivated by these results, we ask: can all properties of planar graphs can be tested in $poly(\varepsilon^{-1})$ queries? Is there a uniform query complexity upper bound for all planar properties, and what is the "hardest" such property to test? We discover a surprisingly clean and optimal answer. Any property of bounded degree planar graphs can be tested in $\exp(O(\varepsilon^{-2}))$ queries. Moreover, there is a matching lower bound, up to constant factors in the exponent. The natural property of testing isomorphism to a fixed graph needs $\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^{-2}))$ queries, thereby showing that (up to polynomial dependencies) isomorphism to an explicit fixed graph is the hardest property of planar graphs. The upper bound is a straightforward adapation of the Newman-Sohler analysis that tracks dependencies on $\varepsilon$ carefully. The main technical contribution is the lower bound construction, which is achieved by a special family of planar graphs that are all mutually far from each other. We can also apply our techniques to get analogous results for bounded treewidth graphs. We prove that all properties of bounded treewidth graphs can be tested in $\exp(O(\varepsilon^{-1}\log \varepsilon^{-1}))$ queries. Moreover, testing isomorphism to a fixed forest requires $\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^{-1}))$ queries.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sabyasachi Basu, Akash Kumar, C. Seshadhri. 2021-08-25. The complexity of testing all properties of planar graphs, and the role of isomorphism. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977073.69

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Beyond Kruskal: Polynomial-Time Tensor Decomposition under the Lovitz-Petrov Condition

Identifiability criteria certify that a given tensor decomposition is a unique rank decomposition. Kruskal's classical condition is one of the best-known deterministic criteria for identifiability. However, no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm is known under the Kruskal condition, and verifying the condition itself is NP-hard. Lovitz and Petrov introduced a strictly more general identifiability condition which, in contrast, is polynomial-time verifiable, but no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm was previously known under this condition. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for tensor decomposition under the Lovitz--Petrov condition. Moreover, combining our algorithm with polynomial-time verification of the Lovitz--Petrov condition yields an efficient end-to-end certification procedure: after computing a decomposition, one can deterministically certify in polynomial time that it is unique and therefore of minimum rank. This contrasts with an arbitrary tensor decomposition, which certifies only an upper bound on the tensor rank, while determining tensor rank is NP-hard in general.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Poisson Exchange Beyond Submodularity: Effective Approximation Algorithms for Offline and Online Subset Selection over Matroids

Over the past decade, a growing body of research has shown that $γ$-weak submodularity broadly arises in numerous subset selection tasks, including feature selection, neural network pruning, and video summarization. Despite its prevalence, maximizing a $γ$-weakly submodular function subject to a general matroid constraint remains challenging. To date, the only known approximation guarantee is the conservative $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ factor established by \citet{chen2018weakly}. To improve upon this result, this paper proposes a novel algorithm called \MGPE, which repeatedly performs maximum-gain local exchanges through careful control of a non-homogeneous Poisson clock, and proves that this \MGPE\ can attain an approximation ratio arbitrarily close to $ρ_γ=1-\left(γ/(2-γ)\right)^{ \frac{γ^2}{2(1-γ)} }$. In sharp contrast to the previous guarantee, our obtained factor $ρ_γ$ not only strictly improves upon $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ for every $γ\in(0,1]$, but also can asymptotically approach the optimal $(1-1/e)$-approximation for submodular maximization as $γ\to1$. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that when the matroid constraint reduces to a cardinality or the objective satisfies the stronger notion of $α$-weak DR-submodularity, \MGPE\ can automatically recover the tight approximation ratios of $1-e^{-γ}$ and $1-e^{-α}$, respectively. Here, $α\in(0,1]$ denotes the DR ratio.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Linear-Query Deterministic Approximation for Non-monotone Submodular Maximization under a Knapsack Constraint

Submodular maximization under a knapsack constraint (SMK) is a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem with broad applications across machine learning and data mining. Motivated by large-scale applications where query efficiency is paramount, we study non-monotone SMK and focus on deterministic algorithms with linear query complexity. Prior deterministic linear-query algorithms achieve at best a $1/5-\varepsilon$ approximation, falling short of the $1/4-\varepsilon$ ratio attainable by randomized algorithms. We close this gap by presenting a deterministic $(1/4-\varepsilon)$-approximation with $O(n\log^2(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ queries. Our approach partitions the analysis based on the cost of the largest optimal element $r$: when the cost of $r$ is moderate, we refine the threshold-twin-greedy framework via residual-budget enumeration to tighten the analysis; when the cost of $r$ is large, we reduce the problem to bicriteria submodular maximization. As a secondary contribution, we obtain a $(1/2-\varepsilon, O(1/\varepsilon))$-bicriteria approximation with $O(n\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ queries, improving over the previous $O(n^2/\varepsilon)$ query bound.

cs.DS↗