Nearly-Linear Time LP Solvers and Rounding Algorithms for Scheduling Problems

Shi Li

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2111.04897

Nearly-Linear Time LP Solvers and Rounding Algorithms for Scheduling Problems

Shi Li

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study nearly-linear time approximation algorithms for non-preemptive scheduling problems in two settings: the unrelated machine setting, and the identical machine with job precedence constraints setting, under the well-studied objectives such as makespan and weighted completion time. For many problems, we develop nearly-linear time approximation algorithms with approximation ratios matching the current best ones achieved in polynomial time. Our main technique is linear programming relaxation. For the unrelated machine setting, we formulate mixed packing and covering LP relaxations of nearly-linear size, and solve them approximately using the nearly-linear time solver of Young. For the makespan objective, we develop a rounding algorithm with $(2+\epsilon)$-approximation ratio. For the weighted completion time objective, we prove the LP is as strong as the rectangle LP used by Im and Li, leading to a nearly-linear time $(1.45 + \epsilon)$-approximation for the problem. For problems in the identical machine with precedence constraints setting, the precedence constraints can not be formulated as packing or covering constraints. To achieve the nearly-linear running time, we define a polytope for the constraints, and leverage the multiplicative weight update (MWU) method with an oracle which always returns solutions in the polytope.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Shi Li. 2021-11-09. Nearly-Linear Time LP Solvers and Rounding Algorithms for Scheduling Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.04897

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗