Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2111.12938

SCLAiR : Supervised Contrastive Learning for User and Device Independent Airwriting Recognition

Abstract

Airwriting Recognition is the problem of identifying letters written in free space with finger movement. It is essentially a specialized case of gesture recognition, wherein the vocabulary of gestures corresponds to letters as in a particular language. With the wide adoption of smart wearables in the general population, airwriting recognition using motion sensors from a smart-band can be used as a medium of user input for applications in Human-Computer Interaction. There has been limited work in the recognition of in-air trajectories using motion sensors, and the performance of the techniques in the case when the device used to record signals is changed has not been explored hitherto. Motivated by these, a new paradigm for device and user-independent airwriting recognition based on supervised contrastive learning is proposed. A two stage classification strategy is employed, the first of which involves training an encoder network with supervised contrastive loss. In the subsequent stage, a classification head is trained with the encoder weights kept frozen. The efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated through experiments on a publicly available dataset and also with a dataset recorded in our lab using a different device. Experiments have been performed in both supervised and unsupervised settings and compared against several state-of-the-art domain adaptation techniques. Data and the code for our implementation will be made available at https://github.com/ayushayt/SCLAiR.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ayush Tripathi, Arnab Kumar Mondal, Lalan Kumar, Prathosh A. P. 2021-12-29. SCLAiR : Supervised Contrastive Learning for User and Device Independent Airwriting Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/lsens.2021.3139473

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Are explainable AI (XAI) evaluation strategies aligned? Comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical evaluation measures using saliency maps

The evaluation of explainable AI (XAI) approaches often relies on three families of methods: subjective measures (e.g., questionnaires on trust or satisfaction), objective measures (e.g., task performance metrics), and mathematical metrics (e.g., for faithfulness). Yet, it remains unclear how these families align or diverge in practice. In a{preregistered} between-subjects study (N=166), we use three established saliency map techniques (LIME, Grad-CAM, Guided Backpropagation) as a testbed to examine this issue. We find that each family of methods leads to different conclusions: participants reported no differences in trust or satisfaction, Grad-CAM improved user performance, while mathematical metrics favored Guided Backpropagation. At the same time, mathematical metrics were only partially related to user performance, and these relationships were sometimes counterintuitive. Our findings highlight the methodological importance of comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical approaches when evaluating XAI, illustrating both tensions and aspects that are aligned. We discuss implications for XAI evaluation frameworks.

cs.HC

Mind Your Ps and Qs: Positive Moderation Practice in the Positive Queue

Online communities rely on volunteer moderators to maintain order. Despite their key role, moderators are given a toolbox of punishments and far less support for encouraging contributions they want to see more of. We introduce the Positive Queue as a positive counterpart to Reddit's modqueue: a dedicated space for moderators to discover contributions and behaviors they want to encourage and positively reinforce. With five moderators, four with 6-14 years of experience, we use the Positive Queue to examine how moderators operationalize positive reinforcement. Moderators combined predicted community reception, observed engagement, and their own judgment; used prediction-engagement mismatches to identify overlooked content; and repurposed positive features for punitive and retrospective work. These findings surface tensions around labor, attribution, and community fit. We contribute the Positive Queue as a working system and conceptualize positive moderation as recognition infrastructure that shapes what moderators notice, whose judgment becomes visible, and how recognition reaches contributors.

cs.HC

PILOT: Control Surfaces for Authoring Social Media Feeds

Personalized social media feeds infer preferences from behavior, leaving people little direct control over what they see. Existing controls range from post-level reactions to rules and natural language, but little is known about how people use them together or how added expressiveness changes effort. We built PILOT, a Bluesky feed-authoring system that turns in-feed actions into explicit preferences, deterministic ranking, and inspectable outcomes. A study with seven participants informed an expanded implementation, which we organized into three nested control surfaces that ten participants compared within subjects. Participants assigned controls to distinct jobs: broad controls set direction, in-post actions refined results, and filters removed content. Richer surfaces did not necessarily feel more effortful, and participants' experiences depended more on whether they could verify and repair outcomes. Our findings show that usable feed control requires not simply more controls, but orchestration across mechanisms that support expression, inspection, repair, and episodic use.

cs.HC