Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2112.02944

Deep differentiable reinforcement learning and optimal trading

Abstract

In many reinforcement learning applications, the underlying environment reward and transition functions are explicitly known differentiable functions. This enables us to use recent research which applies machine learning tools to stochastic control to find optimal action functions. In this paper, we define differentiable reinforcement learning as a particular case of this research. We find that incorporating deep learning in this framework leads to more accurate and stable solutions than those obtained from more generic actor critic algorithms. We apply this deep differentiable reinforcement learning (DDRL) algorithm to the problem of one asset optimal trading strategies in various environments where the market dynamics are known. Thanks to the stability of this method, we are able to efficiently find optimal strategies for complex multi-scale market models. We also extend these methods to simultaneously find optimal action functions for a wide range of environment parameters. This makes it applicable to real life financial signals and portfolio optimization where the expected return has multiple time scales. In the case of a slow and a fast alpha signal, we find that the optimal trading strategy consists in using the fast signal to time the trades associated to the slow signal.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thibault Jaisson. 2022-04-07. Deep differentiable reinforcement learning and optimal trading. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.02944

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Financially Guided Deep Portfolio Optimization

Portfolio optimization in real-world financial markets is notoriously difficult due to non-stationarity, noisy data, and high transaction costs. Standard predict-then-optimize methods first forecast returns and then solve for weights, compounding prediction errors and often failing under regime shifts. We propose an end-to-end framework that directly optimizes differentiable surrogates of key financial metrics (Sharpe ratio, Omega ratio, Conditional Value-at-Risk, and risk parity), allowing neural networks to learn portfolio weights via backpropagation. Our expanding-window walk-forward procedure, applied to 50 S&P 500 stocks from 2007 to 2023, incorporates realistic bid-ask spread costs and rebalances quarterly. On the challenging out-of-sample test period (2022-2023), the best model, an AttentionLSTM with the Omega-CVaR-RiskParity loss, achieves an annualized Sharpe of 0.29 and a total compounded return of +7.86%, while the S&P 500 delivers -4.52% total compounded return and an annualized Sharpe of -0.02. This outperforms the S&P 500 by 12.38 percentage points, while keeping tail risk (CVaR) nearly unchanged. The framework outperforms the equal-weight portfolio, S&P 500, and traditional methods (MVP, HRP, NCO, ERC), demonstrating that embedding financial objectives directly into model training yields robust, economically meaningful outperformance even in adverse market conditions.

q-fin.PM

The geometry of higher order modern portfolio theory

In this article, we study the generalized modern portfolio theory, with utility functions admitting higher-order cumulants. We establish that under certain genericity conditions, the utility function has a constant number of complex critical points. We study the discriminant locus of complex critical points with multiplicity. Finally, we switch our attention to the generalization of the feasible portfolio set (variety), determine its dimension, and give a formula for its degree.

q-fin.PM

Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance

Special Markowitz (SM) regularises returns and covariance jointly, relative to a reference state (mu_ref, Sigma_ref). Each eigendirection of the whitened relative operator carries a signed spectral potential Phi_k, with persistence factor psi_k = exp(-Phi_k) > 0. Positive potentials attenuate empirical deviations from the reference geometry, zero potential preserves them, and negative potentials amplify them. The persistence factor psi_k governs both the return signal and the covariance deviation: the regularised deviation from the reference is psi_k times the empirical deviation. The logarithmic potential coordinate is characterised by a multiplicative composition law on the multiplicative group of positive real numbers; the Stein loss is characterised as the unique free-energy density (within a natural class) compatible with the resulting coupling. The SM pressure functional is additive across modes the defining property of Special Markowitz.

q-fin.PM