Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2112.13379

On the evidence of a trigonometric function value system in Babylon

Abstract

Ratios and coefficients are used to simplify calculations. For geometric usage these values also called function values. Like in Egypt also in Babylon such a value system can be shown. The reconstructed calculation sequence, of the Plimpton 322 cuneiform tablet, presented and described here, shows in its completeness that, around 3800 years ago there already was a systematically applied exact measuring system, with the usage of trigonometric function values. With this approach one can plausibly explain that, as we still it practice today, a geometry of the circle has been used for this calculation. It is based on, but not only, of the usage of the regularities, which 1200 years later, were named after Pythagoras. During a second calculation step, for an intended scaled documentation, presentation or transfer to other locations, the dimensionless calculated function value, was extended, with a fractional part, or more exact spelled a common factor. This transformation creates a real measurable length from the ratios, always related to the smallest unit. The systematic usage by means of inclining triangles already in old Babylonian times, goes far beyond the previously known level of this age. The accuracy of the individual calculation is just as verifiable and on exactly the same level as the trigonometric functions used today. However, at least at this point in time, the Babylonians were content with dividing a quarter circle into at least 150 inclining triangles. This old Babylonian trigonometric function value system, together with the here described "Babylonian diagonal calculation", is thus the forerunner of the Greek chord calculation and the Indo-Arabic trigonometric functions of the early Middle Ages, which we still use today. In addition, the new approach to Plimpton 322 plausible explains why and how such values could have been used.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jens Kleb. 2021-12-26. On the evidence of a trigonometric function value system in Babylon. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13379

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Stairs of Reconciliation: A Mathematical Tourist in Graz

Inside the Grazer Burg, two late-Gothic stone flights rise about distinct spindles, overlap, share several treads, and separate again. Their plan is governed not by a coaxial double helix but, to first approximation, by two intersecting circles. This elementary geometry yields a model of recurrent meeting and makes explicit the compatibility conditions that meeting requires. It also leads to a second object that geometers call a double spiral staircase - the helicoid - and to a useful distinction between resemblance and identity. The staircase becomes a meditation on how paths, models, and disciplines can meet without becoming the same.

math.HO

On the Reconstruction of SAS from Other Triangle Congruence Criteria

Starting from a Hilbert plane and removing the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) congruence axiom, we investigate to what extent SAS can be recovered synthetically from the remaining classical triangle congruence criteria. We show that the Angle-Side-Angle criterion, together with a ray correspondence principle corresponding to Theorem 13 of Hilbert's \emph{Grundlagen der Geometrie}, suffices to reconstruct SAS. We further show that both the Side-Side-Side and the Side-Angle-Angle criteria also suffice, once combined with the ray correspondence principle and suitable auxiliary principles -- the existence of midpoints and a hypotenuse-angle criterion for right triangles in the first case, and the existence of angle bisectors, the congruence of supplements of congruent angles, and the Pons Asinorum in the second. Although the two routes rely on auxiliary principles of different character, we show that they converge on a single final argument once a common hypotenuse-angle criterion is established. A metamathematical analysis, based on an explicit model adapted from Hilbert's own independence construction, complements these reconstructions: it shows that the ray correspondence principle alone cannot reconstruct any of the classical criteria, and that the Pons Asinorum and the hypotenuse-angle criterion are each independent of the remaining auxiliary principles used in their respective reconstructions. The resulting picture is not a formal hierarchy of the congruence criteria, but it does show that the Angle-Side-Angle reconstruction rests on a provably more economical basis than those obtained from Side-Side-Side or Side-Angle-Angle.

math.HO

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO