Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2202.03404

Understanding nature's purpose in starting all new lives with compound growth -- New science for individual systems

Jessie Henshaw
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We often associate compound growth with the Anthropocene and our overwhelming economic impacts on the Earth. Today our actual choices for future society appear to lie with studying the class of emergent natural systems that first develop by compound growth, called 'new lives' here, or "natural complex adaptive systems" (NCAS). The key to their success is first starting with compound growth, a system for growing the system. Its self-organization needs to shift resources from multiplying its scale to maturing and adapting its design for its new environment, a challenging environmental coordination process. We see that taking place in biological reproduction all the time, of course, but it all needs to occur for businesses, economies, cultures, and even for creative work and personal relationships to survive their initial periods of compound growth. Why economic growth as a process that accelerates ever faster still seems unlimited to some seems to come from representing growth as a numerical rather than organizational development process. For example, all kinds of adaptive system organization have limits to how fast they can rearrange their systems. To understand the kinds of limits and adaptations that lead to a successful growth climax and perhaps a long creative life to follow, we combine the most notable observed milestones of successful growth found in nature, divided into 3 main development periods. Those milestones of new lives (MNL) teach us alternative paths to follow The primary milestones include 3 critical events, initiating 3 feedback periods, for 3 organizational development stages, occurring in 3 environments. Together they can be called the A, B, C, egg, nest, world, or natural growth pattern. By observing them in familiar cases, we learn the patterns that also apply in others.

Explore related subjects

physics.soc-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jessie Henshaw. 2022-02-07. Understanding nature's purpose in starting all new lives with compound growth -- New science for individual systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.03404

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Extending the Biswas--Chatterjee--Sen model with nonconformists and inflexibles

Originally, the Biswas--Chatterjee--Sen model was shown to exhibit an order/disorder phase transition for a sufficiently large number of negative interactions among actors. In this paper, the model is extended by the existence of anticonformists and inflexibles. Anticonformists are actors who define themselves in opposition to the group and may intentionally reject what most people accept, while inflexibles are those who do not change their opinions at all. Both discrete and continuous opinions are considered. With direct Monte Carlo simulations and mean-field calculations, we check the influence of fractions of anticonformists and inflexibles on the mean opinion in the system. With the mean-field calculations, we identify ranges of fractions of anticonformists where an ordered phase of the system is available. The results of the mean-field calculations perfectly match the results of the Monte Carlo simulations. We consider inflexibles adhered: (i) to extreme opinions; (ii) to specific opinions, and (iii) chosen independently of their initial opinion. For inflexibles adhered to specific and extreme opinions, they play a role of an effective bias suppressing the disordered phase in the system. The qualitative results of introducing anticonformists (inflexibles) in various ways (discrete/continuous opinions and annealed/quenched disorder) are roughly the same. However, for the model extended by inflexibles, we can observe a systematic shift of the mean order parameter to its higher values for quenched disorder compared with annealed disorder. On the other hand, for anticonformists modeled with a continuous space of opinions, we can observe a systematic shift of the mean order parameter to its higher values compared with the discrete space of opinions.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2026

Inferring Coupling Strength from the Kuramoto Order Parameter

Accurately estimating the coupling strength in oscillator networks from macroscopic observations is essential for predicting synchronization transitions. We consider the inverse problem of reconstructing the unknown coupling strength $K$ in the globally coupled Kuramoto model from scalar observations of the macroscopic order parameter $R(t)$, assuming that the natural frequencies and the initial phase configuration are known. After initialization, individual phase trajectories are treated as hidden, and only the scalar order parameter is observed. We employ an extended Kalman filter with an augmented state representation that recursively estimates the coupling strength from observations of $R(t)$. By exploiting the mean-field structure of the globally coupled Kuramoto model, the covariance prediction step can be computed efficiently, substantially reducing the computational cost. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the proposed estimator accurately reconstructs the coupling strength and remains stable even when $R(t)$ is small and strongly fluctuating.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2026

Blind directions of physical learning networks: where to measure and what to measure

A physical learning network is read at a few accessible nodes. Every task and learning rule that uses only the steady voltages and currents there, at a fixed operating point, acts through the boundary response map. Changes in the kernel of its Jacobian are blind to first order. A walk along one fiber ran to a 600-step cap, one edge then at 15.2 times its start. A decomposition theorem splits the response Jacobian over the hidden components. The blind dimension adds over components whose surviving slots are disjoint. A boundary-to-boundary edge adds one parameter and deletes one slot. Exposing a hidden node changes only its component. For one hidden node the contribution counts the bipartite components of the non-adjacency graph of its neighbors. For a pocket of h hidden nodes a factor-analysis bound caps what outside electrodes can expose. It is attained when every pocket node meets every neighbor and no edge joins two of those neighbors, so past a threshold further electrodes outside such a pocket expose nothing. An electrode inside such a pocket, when its hidden nodes form a clique, is worth h-1 directions where one outside is worth none. Read as vector displacements rather than potentials, the same nodes left no deficit beyond counting in all 90 spring networks tested, each a pocket fully joined to five or more accessible nodes, and nothing blind in 88. What limits the reading is the quantity measured as much as the number of contacts. Maximum-weight spanning forests give a proved upper bound on the blind dimension. The matching equality is proved for one hidden node and conjectured beyond. It holds in all 5,343 components whose maximum could be attained and certified, and the forest count matched the certified blind dimension in 1,448 of 1,500 held-out networks, where the maximum must be searched. A self-learning circuit shows the split on hardware.

physics.soc-ph↗