Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2202.08214

Lower Bounds for Subset Sum in Resolution with Modular Counting

Abstract

In this paper we prove lower bounds for sizes of refutations of unsatisfiable vector Subset Sum instances $\overrightarrow{a}_1 x_1 + \dots + \overrightarrow{a}_n x_n = \overrightarrow{b}$ in the proof system Res(lin$_{\mathbb{F}_q}$) where $char(\mathbb{F}_{q})\geq 5$. As a basis for the hardness criterion for such instances we choose the property of the matrix $A$ with columns $(\overrightarrow{a}_1, \ldots, \overrightarrow{a}_n)$ to be (the transpose of) the generating matrix for a good error-correcting code $C_{A} := \{x\cdot A\, |\, x \in \mathbb{F}_{q}^k\}\subset \mathbb{F}_{q}^n$ and prove the following lower bounds: 1) For a dag-like fragment of Res(lin$_{\mathbb{F}_q}$). We introduce the notion of $(s,r)$-robustness for Subset Sum instances, which in particular implies that $A$ defines an error-correcting code with the minimal distance $s\geq r$. For $(s,r)$-robust instances we prove $2^{Ω(r)}$ lower bound for sizes of refutations in a dag-like fragment of Res(lin$_{\mathbb{F}_q}$). We show that random instances are $(n / 3, Ω\left((n/(q + 1)\ln q))^{1/3}\right))$-robust and that specific examples achieving these bounds can be constructed using algebraic geometry codes. 2) For tree-like Res(lin$_{\mathbb{F}_q}$) refutations we show the size lower bound $2^{Ω({((q+1)\ln q)^{-1/3}}d^{1/5})}$ for any Subset Sum instance where $d$ is the minimal distance of $C_{A}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fedor Part. 2026-04-22. Lower Bounds for Subset Sum in Resolution with Modular Counting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08214

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC