Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2203.02536

Beyond Time Complexity: Data Movement Complexity Analysis for Matrix Multiplication

Wesley Smith·Aidan Goldfarb·Chen Ding
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Data movement is becoming the dominant contributor to the time and energy costs of computation across a wide range of application domains. However, time complexity is inadequate to analyze data movement. This work expands upon Data Movement Distance, a recently proposed framework for memory-aware algorithm analysis, by 1) demonstrating that its assumptions conform with microarchitectural trends, 2) applying it to six variants of matrix multiplication, and 3) showing it to be capable of asymptotically differentiating algorithms with the same time complexity but different memory behavior, as well as locality optimized vs. non-optimized versions of the same algorithm. In doing so, we attempt to bridge theory and practice by combining the operation count analysis used by asymptotic time complexity with per-operation data movement cost resulting from hierarchical memory structure. Additionally, this paper derives the first fully precise, fully analytical form of recursive matrix multiplication's miss ratio curve on LRU caching systems. Our results indicate that the Data Movement Distance framework is a powerful tool going forward for engineers and algorithm designers to understand the algorithmic implications of hierarchical memory.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Wesley Smith, Aidan Goldfarb, Chen Ding. 2022-03-04. Beyond Time Complexity: Data Movement Complexity Analysis for Matrix Multiplication. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02536

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗