Maxway CRT: Improving the Robustness of the Model-X Inference

Shuangning Li; Molei Liu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2203.06496

Maxway CRT: Improving the Robustness of the Model-X Inference

Shuangning Li·Molei Liu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The model-X conditional randomization test (CRT) is a flexible and powerful testing procedure for the conditional independence hypothesis: X is independent of Y conditioning on Z. Though having many attractive properties, the model-X CRT relies on the model-X assumption that we have perfect knowledge of the distribution of X | Z. If there is an error in modeling the distribution of X | Z, this approach may lose its validity. This problem is even more severe when the adjustment covariates Z are of high dimensionality, in which situation precise modeling of X against Z can be hard. In response to this, we propose the Maxway (Model and Adjust X With the Assistance of Y) CRT, which learns the distribution of Y | Z, and uses it to calibrate the resampling distribution of X to gain robustness to the error in modeling X. We prove that the type-I error inflation of the Maxway CRT can be controlled by the learning error for the low-dimensional adjusting model plus the product of learning errors for X | Z and Y | Z, which could be interpreted as an "almost doubly robust" property. Based on this, we develop implementing algorithms of the Maxway CRT in practical scenarios including (surrogate-assisted) semi-supervised learning and transfer learning where valid information about Y | Z can be potentially provided by some auxiliary or external data. Through extensive simulation studies under different scenarios, we demonstrate that the Maxway CRT achieves significantly better type-I error control than existing model-X inference approaches while preserving similar powers. Finally, we apply our methodology to two real examples, including (1) studying obesity paradox with electronic health record (EHR) data assisted by surrogate variables; (2) inferring the side effect of statins among the ethnic minority group via transferring knowledge from the majority group.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Shuangning Li, Molei Liu. 2023-05-01. Maxway CRT: Improving the Robustness of the Model-X Inference. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06496

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗