Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2204.04140

Reproducibility and Baseline Reporting for Dynamic Multi-objective Benchmark Problems

Daniel Herring·Michael Kirley·Xin Yao
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dynamic multi-objective optimization problems (DMOPs) are widely accepted to be more challenging than stationary problems due to the time-dependent nature of the objective functions and/or constraints. Evaluation of purpose-built algorithms for DMOPs is often performed on narrow selections of dynamic instances with differing change magnitude and frequency or a limited selection of problems. In this paper, we focus on the reproducibility of simulation experiments for parameters of DMOPs. Our framework is based on an extension of PlatEMO, allowing for the reproduction of results and performance measurements across a range of dynamic settings and problems. A baseline schema for dynamic algorithm evaluation is introduced, which provides a mechanism to interrogate performance and optimization behaviours of well-known evolutionary algorithms that were not designed specifically for DMOPs. Importantly, by determining the maximum capability of non-dynamic multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, we can establish the minimum capability required of purpose-built dynamic algorithms to be useful. The simplest modifications to manage dynamic changes introduce diversity. Allowing non-dynamic algorithms to incorporate mutated/random solutions after change events determines the improvement possible with minor algorithm modifications. Future expansion to include current dynamic algorithms will enable reproduction of their results and verification of their abilities and performance across DMOP benchmark space.

Explore related subjects

cs.NE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Herring, Michael Kirley, Xin Yao. 2022-04-08. Reproducibility and Baseline Reporting for Dynamic Multi-objective Benchmark Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.04140

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Persistent Memory Through Triple-Loop Consolidation Under Stochastic Unit Turnover

Dissipative cognitive architectures maintain computation through continuous energy expenditure, where units that exhaust their energy are stochastically replaced with fresh random state. This creates a fundamental challenge: how can persistent, context-specific memory survive when all learnable state is periodically destroyed? Existing memory mechanisms -- including elastic weight consolidation, synaptic intelligence, and surprise-driven gating -- rely on gradient computation and are inapplicable to systems that do not perform it. We introduce Deep Memory (DM), a backpropagation-free persistent memory mechanism operating through a triple-loop consolidation cycle: (1) recording of expert-specific content centroids, (2) seeding of replaced units with stored representations, and (3) stabilization through continuous re-entry. Discrete expert routing via Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) gating is required, in the regimes tested, to prevent the centroid convergence that would render stored memories identical. We derive a Foster-Lyapunov drift bound for the full triple loop, showing that seeding rescales the turnover noise floor. Across $1{,}007$ simulation runs over thirteen blocks: (i) removing stable context-expert binding removes specialization ($\mathrm{MI}=1.10$ vs. $0.001$; $n=91$); (ii) DM achieves $R=0.984$ vs. $0.385$ without memory ($n=16$); (iii) continuous seeding reconstructs representations after interference ($R_\mathrm{recon}=0.978$; one-shot fails; $n=30$); (iv) the mechanism operates within a characterized $(K,p)$ envelope ($n=350$); (v) recording $\times$ seeding is the minimal critical dyad ($n=40$); (vi) associative and reservoir baselines (Hopfield, ESN) are compared under matched turnover ($n=370$). DM is thus a falsifiable, bounded mechanism for persistent memory in backpropagation-free cognitive systems, with functional parallels to hippocampal consolidation.

cs.NE↗
arXiv2026

EvoTreeNAD: Genealogy-Guided Evolution for LLM-Driven Neural Architecture Discovery

AI-driven scientific discovery accelerates research by autonomously developing solutions and designs. Large language model (LLM) agents support this process through iterative generation and evaluation. Yet these iterations alone do not ensure cumulative progress or establish which directions to pursue next. Costly evaluation further constrains the scope of exploration. Neural architecture discovery brings these challenges together, coupling open-ended design with resource-intensive experimentation. We introduce EvoTreeNAD, a genealogy-guided evolutionary algorithm that constructs trainable architectures without a supplied seed or a hand-specified search space. Starting from an empty root, it grows a persistent genealogy in which each new node represents a complete architecture. Top-percentile values computed from each node and its descendants guide lineage selection. Using the selected design history, an Idea Agent proposes a variant and a Code Agent implements it. Each evaluated variant becomes a child node, expanding the genealogy while providing evidence for subsequent lineage selection. Our theoretical analysis establishes the existence of stationary variation regimes as the genealogy grows. Under specified variation assumptions, sustained top-percentile family values quantify the probability of generating high-reward architectures in these regimes. EvoTreeNAD discovers architectures that outperform the compared NAS and NAD baselines, achieving CIFAR-10/100 test errors of $2.05{\pm}0.06\%$ and $15.09{\pm}0.22\%$. On all six MedMNIST-v2 tasks, the discovered architectures surpass the strongest listed baselines. A controlled CIFAR-10 study further shows that EvoTreeNAD outperforms direct generation, best-of-$N$ greedy continuation, and full-family-mean routing.

cs.NE↗
arXiv2026

Combining LLMs and Genetic Search for ARC-AGI-2

LLMs can generate programs for ARC-AGI-2 tasks, but the provided compute only allows a small number of attempts to generate, debug and validate solutions. Genetic algorithms can search and test many more programs, but random search rarely starts in a useful neighborhood of the solution space. We combine the two methods through a compact domain specific language (DSL). First, a quantized Qwen3.5-4B LLM generates an initial set of programs for each ARCAGI-2 task. Then, we use those programs to seed an initial population of starting programs, and use genetic algorithms to evolve these programs towards a solution to the given task. The DSL is designed such that every mutated program remains valid and can be executed. The initial programs proposed by the LLM solve 2 (3.3%) of the first 60 tasks of the ARC-2 public evaluation set. The genetic algorithm solves an additional 4, giving 6 correct test outputs in total (10.0%). If we try using evolving solutions without this LLM seeding, we do not arrive at any solutions at all. The results show that genetic search can improve programs generated by LLMs and produce additional correct solutions.

cs.NE↗