Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2204.10402

Parallel Vertex Cover Algorithms on GPUs

Abstract

Finding small vertex covers in a graph has applications in numerous domains. Two common formulations of the problem include: Minimum Vertex Cover, which finds the smallest vertex cover in a graph, and Parameterized Vertex Cover, which finds a vertex cover whose size is less than or equal to some parameter $k$. Algorithms for both formulations traverse a search tree, which grows exponentially with the size of the graph or the value of $k$. Parallelizing the traversal of the vertex cover search tree on GPUs is challenging for multiple reasons. First, the search tree is a narrow binary tree which makes it difficult to extract enough sub-trees to process in parallel to fully utilize the GPU's resources. Second, the search tree is highly imbalanced which makes load balancing across a massive number of parallel GPU workers challenging. Third, keeping around all the intermediate state needed to traverse many sub-trees in parallel puts high pressure on the GPU's memory resources and may act as a limiting factor to parallelism. To address these challenges, we propose an approach to traverse the vertex cover search tree in parallel using GPUs while handling dynamic load balancing. Each thread block traverses a different sub-tree using a local stack, however, we also use a global worklist to balance load. Blocks contribute branches of their sub-trees to the global worklist on an as-needed basis, while blocks that finish their sub-trees get new ones from the global worklist. We use degree arrays to represent intermediate graphs so that the representation is compact in memory to avoid limiting parallelism, but self-contained which is necessary for load balancing. Our evaluation shows that compared to prior work, our hybrid approach of using local stacks and a global worklist substantially improves performance and reduces load imbalance, especially on difficult instances of the problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter Yamout, Karim Barada, Adnan Jaljuli, Amer E. Mouawad, Izzat El Hajj. 2022-04-21. Parallel Vertex Cover Algorithms on GPUs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.10402

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Concertina: Data-Centric Adaptive Pipeline Parallelism for Efficient Heterogeneous Long-Context LLM Training

Long context training is crucial for extending LLM context windows. Existing schemes, such as sequence parallelism, incur substantial communication overhead. Pipeline parallelism (PP) reduces this cost, but its effectiveness hinges on partitioning granularity. Batch-level PP employing sequence packing exhibits high memory consumption in long-context scenarios, whereas token-level PP splitting sequences into slices alleviates memory overhead but may introduce performance degradation. Moreover, the skewed sequence-length distribution in real-world datasets defeats any monolithic, static choice of PP granularity. In this paper, we propose \textit{Dynamic Pipeline Parallelism} (DPP), which transforms PP granularity from a static design choice into a workload-adaptive optimization space over packed, split, and hybrid chunks. DPP further introduces a new coupling between heterogeneous pipeline scheduling and gradient checkpointing. To solve this coupling, \name co-optimizes dynamic chunk scheduling with \textit{Stage-Aware Chunk-Level Adaptive Checkpointing}. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that \name achieves up to 1.69\texttimes\ speedup over FlexSP and up to 1.40\texttimes\ over MEPipe. The source code is available at https://github.com/wsjdsg/InfiniPipe-code.

cs.DC

A Low-Latency Semantic State Estimator using Latent Predictive Learning for Dynamic Network Monitoring and Orchestration

Closed-loop network monitoring and orchestration increasingly require semantic interpretations of live telemetry beyond raw counter collection. However, dynamic cloud-edge environments change both the active node set and the monitoring query at runtime, while control loops demand bounded millisecond-scale responses. We introduce a latent predictive state estimator (LPSE) for dynamic network monitoring and orchestration, built on latent predictive learning over streaming telemetry. The framework converts variable-cardinality node telemetry into topology-adaptive temporal representations, fuses them with monitoring questions, and returns bounded answers from a semantic codebook instead of autoregressive text generation. This design enables fixed-cost, single-pass inference while preserving semantic interpretability. By operating on permutation-invariant, slot-routed node representations keyed by stable identity, the model maintains a fixed input space and generalizes to node addition, removal, and reordering without retraining. Experimental results on a multi-node Kubernetes cluster show semantic prediction accuracy of 87.13% at approximately 72x lower mean inference latency compared to the lowest latency LLM tested.

cs.DC

X-Stage: Modeling Post-Issue Backpressure in GPU Communication--Computation Fusion

Fine-grained, device-initiated communication allows fused GPU kernels to issue remote stores directly from their compute pipelines, a pattern increasingly used in expert parallelism (EP), tensor parallelism (TP), and Ulysses-style sequence parallelism (UP). Existing designs reason about where communication is issued and when remote data becomes ready, but lack a quantitative model of the sender-side interval after a remote store is accepted and before it becomes visible at the destination. This interval determines whether communication remains decoupled from computation or backpressures it. We identify X-Stage, a software-visible post-issue stage with finite decoupling. Downstream pressure can dissipate while the issuer resumes useful work, whereas sustained injection consumes X-Stage headroom and eventually stalls the compute pipeline. We characterize this behavior and build a calibrated model that predicts whether remote-store arrivals accumulate backpressure or recover during intervening computation. Guided by the model, we reshape bursty arrivals when they would exhaust X-Stage headroom and exploit natural compute windows when headroom can recover concurrently. Evaluation across representative EP, TP, and UP workloads shows up to 1.62x fused-kernel, 1.75x end-to-end, and 1.43x sender-visible speedup, respectively. Microbenchmarks further validate the model's predictions of backlog accumulation, recovery, and sender-side backpressure.

cs.DC