Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2205.07671

Development, Deployment, and Evaluation of DyMand -- An Open-Source Smartwatch and Smartphone System for Capturing Couples' Dyadic Interactions in Chronic Disease Management in Daily Life

Abstract

Dyadic interactions of couples are of interest as they provide insight into relationship quality and chronic disease management. Currently, ambulatory assessment of couples' interactions entails collecting data at random or scheduled times which could miss significant couples' interaction/conversation moments. In this work, we developed, deployed and evaluated DyMand, a novel open-source smartwatch and smartphone system for collecting self-report and sensor data from couples based on partners' interaction moments. Our smartwatch-based algorithm uses the Bluetooth signal strength between two smartwatches each worn by one partner, and a voice activity detection machine-learning algorithm to infer that the partners are interacting, and then to trigger data collection. We deployed the DyMand system in a 7-day field study and collected data about social support, emotional well-being, and health behavior from 13 (N=26) Swiss-based heterosexual couples managing diabetes mellitus type 2 of one partner. Our system triggered 99.1% of the expected number of sensor and self-report data when the app was running, and 77.6% of algorithm-triggered recordings contained partners' conversation moments compared to 43.8% for scheduled triggers. The usability evaluation showed that DyMand was easy to use. DyMand can be used by social, clinical, or health psychology researchers to understand the social dynamics of couples in everyday life, and for developing and delivering behavioral interventions for couples who are managing chronic diseases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

George Boateng, Prabhakaran Santhanam, Elgar Fleisch, Janina Lüscher, Theresa Pauly, Urte Scholz, Tobias Kowatsch. 2022-05-16. Development, Deployment, and Evaluation of DyMand -- An Open-Source Smartwatch and Smartphone System for Capturing Couples' Dyadic Interactions in Chronic Disease Management in Daily Life. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07671

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Are explainable AI (XAI) evaluation strategies aligned? Comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical evaluation measures using saliency maps

The evaluation of explainable AI (XAI) approaches often relies on three families of methods: subjective measures (e.g., questionnaires on trust or satisfaction), objective measures (e.g., task performance metrics), and mathematical metrics (e.g., for faithfulness). Yet, it remains unclear how these families align or diverge in practice. In a{preregistered} between-subjects study (N=166), we use three established saliency map techniques (LIME, Grad-CAM, Guided Backpropagation) as a testbed to examine this issue. We find that each family of methods leads to different conclusions: participants reported no differences in trust or satisfaction, Grad-CAM improved user performance, while mathematical metrics favored Guided Backpropagation. At the same time, mathematical metrics were only partially related to user performance, and these relationships were sometimes counterintuitive. Our findings highlight the methodological importance of comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical approaches when evaluating XAI, illustrating both tensions and aspects that are aligned. We discuss implications for XAI evaluation frameworks.

cs.HC

Mind Your Ps and Qs: Positive Moderation Practice in the Positive Queue

Online communities rely on volunteer moderators to maintain order. Despite their key role, moderators are given a toolbox of punishments and far less support for encouraging contributions they want to see more of. We introduce the Positive Queue as a positive counterpart to Reddit's modqueue: a dedicated space for moderators to discover contributions and behaviors they want to encourage and positively reinforce. With five moderators, four with 6-14 years of experience, we use the Positive Queue to examine how moderators operationalize positive reinforcement. Moderators combined predicted community reception, observed engagement, and their own judgment; used prediction-engagement mismatches to identify overlooked content; and repurposed positive features for punitive and retrospective work. These findings surface tensions around labor, attribution, and community fit. We contribute the Positive Queue as a working system and conceptualize positive moderation as recognition infrastructure that shapes what moderators notice, whose judgment becomes visible, and how recognition reaches contributors.

cs.HC

PILOT: Control Surfaces for Authoring Social Media Feeds

Personalized social media feeds infer preferences from behavior, leaving people little direct control over what they see. Existing controls range from post-level reactions to rules and natural language, but little is known about how people use them together or how added expressiveness changes effort. We built PILOT, a Bluesky feed-authoring system that turns in-feed actions into explicit preferences, deterministic ranking, and inspectable outcomes. A study with seven participants informed an expanded implementation, which we organized into three nested control surfaces that ten participants compared within subjects. Participants assigned controls to distinct jobs: broad controls set direction, in-post actions refined results, and filters removed content. Richer surfaces did not necessarily feel more effortful, and participants' experiences depended more on whether they could verify and repair outcomes. Our findings show that usable feed control requires not simply more controls, but orchestration across mechanisms that support expression, inspection, repair, and episodic use.

cs.HC