Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2206.00117

Disclosure of Investment Advisor and Broker-Dealer Relationships: Impact on Comprehension and Decision Making

Abstract

Recently enacted regulations aimed to enhance retail investors' understanding about different types of investment accounts. Toward this goal, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandated that SEC-registered investment advisors and broker-dealers provide a brief relationship summary (Form CRS) to retail investors. The present study examines the impact of this regulation on investors and considers its market implications. The effects of Form CRS were evaluated based on three outcome variables: perceived helpfulness, comprehension, and decision making. The study also examined whether personal characteristics, such as investment experience, influenced the disclosure's impact on decision making. Results indicated that participants perceived the disclosure as helpful and it significantly enhanced comprehension about the two types of investment accounts. Critically, participants also showed increased preference and choice for broker-dealers after the disclosure. Increased preference for broker-dealers was associated with greater investment experience, greater comprehension gains, and access to more information from a longer disclosure. These findings suggest that Form CRS may promote informed decision making among retail investors while simultaneously increasing the selection of broker-dealer accounts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiaoqing Wan, Nichole R. Lighthall. 2022-06-02. Disclosure of Investment Advisor and Broker-Dealer Relationships: Impact on Comprehension and Decision Making. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00117

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN