Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2206.02798

Impact of micro-credit on the livelihoods of clients -- A study on Sunamganj District

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to assess the impact of micro credit on the livelihoods of the clients in the haor area of Sunamganj district, Sylhet, Bangladesh. The major findings of the study are that 66.2 percent respondents of borrowers and 98.7 non-borrowers are head of the family and an average 76.6 percent and among the borrowers 32 percent is husband/wife while 1.3 percent of non-borrowers and on average 22.2. In terms of sex 64.7 percent of borrowers and 92.5 percent of non-borrowers are male while 35.3 percent of borrowers and 7.5 percent of non-borrowers are female. The impact of micro-credit in terms of formal and informal credit receiving households based on DID method showed that total income, total expenditure and investment have been increased 13.57 percent, 10.39 percent and 26.17 percent. All the elements of total income have been increased except debt which has been decreased by 2.39 percent. But the decrease in debt is the good sign of positive impact of debt. Consumption of food has been increased but non-food has been decreased. All the elements of investment have been increased except some factors. The savings has been decreased due excess increase in investment. The study suggested that for breaking vicious cycle of poverty by micro-credit the duration of loans should be at least five year and the volume of loans must be minimum 500,000 and repayment should at not be less than monthly. The rate of interest should not be more than 5 percent.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nazrul Islam. 2022-06-06. Impact of micro-credit on the livelihoods of clients -- A study on Sunamganj District. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.02798

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN