Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2207.00862

Static Hedging of Freight Rate Risk in the Shipping Market under Model Uncertainty

Abstract

Freight rate derivatives constitute a very popular financial tool in shipping industry, that allows to the market participants and the individuals operating in the field, to reassure their financial positions against the risk occurred by the volatility of the freight rates. The special structure of the shipping market attracted the interest of both academics and practitioners, since pricing of the related traded options which are written on non-storable assets (i.e. the freight service) is not a trivial task. Management of freight risk is of major importance to preserve the viability of shipping operations, especially in periods where shocks appear in the world economy, which introduces uncertainty in the freight rate prices. In practice, the reduction of freight risk is almost exclusively performed by constructing hedging portfolios relying on freight rate options. These portfolios needs to be robust to the market uncertainties, i.e. to choose the portfolio which returns will be as less as it gets affected by the market changes. Especially, for time periods where the future states of the market (even in short term) are extremely ambiguous, i.e. there are a number of different scenarios that can occur, it is of great importance for the firms to decide robustly to these uncertainties. In this work, a framework for the robust treatment of model uncertainty in (a) modeling the freight rates dynamics employing the notion of Wasserstein barycenter and (b) in choosing the optimal hedging strategy for freight risk management, is proposed. A carefully designed simulation study in the discussed hedging problem, employing standard modelling approaches in freight rates literature, illustrates the capabilities of the proposed method with very satisfactory results in approximating the optimal strategy even in high noise cases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Georgios I. Papayiannis. 2025-04-29. Static Hedging of Freight Rate Risk in the Shipping Market under Model Uncertainty. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-025-00990-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Dynamic reinsurance via martingale transport

We formulate a dynamic reinsurance problem in which the insurer seeks to satisfy prescribed terminal moment or risk-based constraints while minimizing the $L^2$-norm of the ceded risk. As a tool for this analysis, we first use techniques from martingale optimal transport to study the auxiliary problem in which the insurer matches a given terminal distribution of the surplus process. We show that, under suitable assumptions, this auxiliary problem admits a tractable solution analogous to the Bass martingale. We then relax this condition by only requiring certain moment or risk-based constraints.

q-fin.RM

Risk Measures under Paired-Ambiguity: A Deep Learning Reflected BSDE Framework

We study optimal stopping under dynamic risk measures with simultaneous ambiguity in the probability model and the discount rate. We introduce a paired ambiguity framework combining Girsanov model uncertainty with cash subadditive risk evaluation and characterize the stopping value by an upper reflected backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE). We establish structural properties of the resulting stopping operator and study quadratic drivers associated with entropic risk measures, obtaining explicit stopping rules in several benchmark cases. We then develop a deep learning scheme for the reflected quadratic BSDE. The convergence analysis uses discrete reflection and truncation to reduce the quadratic problem to a globally Lipschitz system and combines reflected BSDE discretization estimates with neural network approximation errors. Numerical experiments for American options illustrate the effects of discount rate and entropic ambiguity on stopping values and exercise decisions.

q-fin.RM

When Is the Gini Loading More Prudent? Tail Structure and the Ordering of the Standard Deviation and the Gini Mean Difference

The standard deviation (SD) and the Gini mean difference (GMD) are the two canonical measures of variability used to load premiums, set risk margins and allocate capital, yet no universal ordering between them exists. We show that the comparison is \emph{equivalent} to asking whether the coefficient of variation of the spacing $|X-X'|$ generated by two independent copies of the risk exceeds unity, so that the exponential law -- whose spacing is again exponential -- is the universal knife-edge separating the two regimes. Reading the GMD as twice the maxiance, that is, as a second-order \emph{dual} moment in the sense of Yaari's dual theory, the problem becomes an explicit comparison of primal and dual second-order variability. We derive a closed-form representation of the mean excess function of the spacing in terms of the hazard and reverse hazard rates of $X$, and use it to prove that heavy-tailed behavior -- a decreasing hazard rate or an increasing reverse hazard rate -- yields SD dominance, whereas two-sided light tails yield GMD dominance; within the monotone aging classes, equality characterizes the exponential law. Both regimes are stable under truncation, convolution and mixing, which makes them operational in collective risk and frailty models. We classify the severity, lifetime and frequency distributions of actuarial practice accordingly, quantify the consequences for SD- and Gini-loaded premium principles and for Gini-type tail risk measures, and show that the sign of $\mathrm{SD}-\mathrm{GMD}$ across thresholds furnishes a simple diagnostic for tail aging.

q-fin.RM