Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2207.06239

A Practical Method for Preventing Forced Wins in Ultimate Tic-Tac-Toe

Abstract

Ultimate Tic-Tac-Toe is a variant of the popular Tic-Tac-Toe game. Two players compete to win three aligned "fields," with each field constituting its own miniature tic-tac-toe game. Each move determines which field the next player must play in. Prior studies have shown that there exists a forced winning strategy for the first player, whereby they can win in at least 29 moves and at most 43 moves. This paper proposes a practical solution to the forced-win problem discovered by Bertholon et al., by putting forth a simple method for randomizing the first set of moves that are played. This method uses 5 randomly generated digits between 0 and 8 to arbitrarily place the first 4 moves of the game, and helps players avoid forced wins without having to change other rules of the game. This paper also investigates the probability that a random placement of the first 4 moves will lead to an easily calculable forced win, and shows that this probability is precisely 56/59049, or 0.0948%.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Justin Diamond. 2023-06-08. A Practical Method for Preventing Forced Wins in Ultimate Tic-Tac-Toe. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.06239

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO