Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2207.11963

Power Flows with Flat Voltage Profiles: an Exact Approach

Abstract

This note outlines the exact solution to the power flow problem in AC electrical networks under the assumption of 'flat' or uniform voltage profiles. This solution generalises the common 'DC power flow' approach to electrical network problems where the detail of the voltage profile is disregarded and the focus is on the distribution of active power flows and voltage phase angles. In the usual approach to the problem, network resistance is ignored and simplified power-angle relations are used based on branch reactances alone. The purpose of this note is to describe a tractable generalisation of this approach to account for arbitrary network resistances. The solution is worked in detail for a single network branch with resistance $R \geq 0$ and reactance $X > 0$, with explicit formulae derived linking branch impedance, active and reactive power flows, voltage phase displacement and losses under the 'flat' voltage profile assumption. These formulae have a convenient expression in terms of a 'coefficient of support' which relates the assumed active power flow to the corresponding reactive power consumed on the branch, and encapsulates much of the mathematical technicalities in the exact solution. It is shown that when network resistance is taken into account, the angle displacement $\delta_j - \delta_k$ between adjacent bus voltages is always larger than given by the lossless power-angle relation $\sin(\delta_j - \delta_k) = XP$. The approach is applied to the analysis of circulating power flows in large networks, building on the classic work of Janssens and Kamagate (2003). It is seen that in networks with nonzero branch resistances, a circulating flow of active power is always accompanied by a counter-circulating flow of reactive power.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Anthony B. Morton. 2022-07-25. Power Flows with Flat Voltage Profiles: an Exact Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.11963

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO