Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2208.13726

Improved Grant-Free Access for URLLC via Multi-Tier-Driven Computing: Network-Load Learning, Prediction, and Resource Allocation

Abstract

Grant-Free (GF) access has been recognized as a promising candidate for Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications (URLLC). However, even with GF access, URLLC still may not effectively gain high reliability and millimeter-level latency, simultaneously. This is because the network load is typically time-varying and not known to the base station (BS), and thus, the resource allocated for GF access cannot well adapt to variations of the network load, resulting in low resource utilization efficiency under light network load and leading to severe collisions under heavy network load. To tackle this problem, we propose a multi-tier-driven computing framework and the associated algorithms for URLLC to support users with different QoS requirements. Especially, we concentrate on K - repetition GF access in light of its simplicity and well-balanced performance for practical systems. In particular, our framework consists of three tiers of computation, namely network-load learning, network-load prediction, and adaptive resource allocation. In the first tier, the BS can learn the network-load information from the states (success, collision, and idle) of random-access resources in terms of resource blocks (RB) and time slots. In the second tier, the network-load variation is effectively predicted based on estimation results from the first tier. Finally, in the third tier, by deriving and weighing the failure probabilities of different groups of users, their QoS requirements, and the predicted network loads, the BS is able to dynamically allocate sufficient resources accommodating the varying network loads. Simulation results show that our proposed approach can estimate the network load more accurately compared with the baseline schemes. Moreover, our adaptive resource allocation offers an effective way to enhance the QoS for different URLLC services, simultaneously.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zixiao Zhao, Qinghe Du, George K. Karagiannidis. 2022-08-23. Improved Grant-Free Access for URLLC via Multi-Tier-Driven Computing: Network-Load Learning, Prediction, and Resource Allocation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.13726

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Efficient and rate-optimal list-decoding in the presence of minimal feedback

Given a channel with length-$n$ inputs and outputs over the alphabet $\{0,1,\ldots,q-1\}$, and of which a fraction $\varrho \in (0,1-1/q)$ of symbols can be arbitrarily corrupted by an adversary, a fundamental problem is that of communicating at rates close to the information-theoretically optimal values, while ensuring the receiver can infer that the transmitter's message is from a ``small" set. While the existence of such codes is known, and constructions with computationally tractable encoding/decoding procedures are known for large $q$, we provide the first schemes that attain this performance for any $q \geq 2$, as long as low-rate feedback (asymptotically negligible relative to the number of transmissions) from the receiver to the transmitter is available. For any sufficiently small $\varepsilon > 0$ and $\varrho \in (1-{1}/{q}-Θ(\sqrt{\varepsilon}))$ our minimal feedback scheme has the following parameters: Rate $1-H_q(\varrho) - \varepsilon$ (i.e., $\varepsilon$-close to information-theoretically optimal -- here $H_q(\varrho)$ is the $q$-ary entropy function), list-size $\exp\left(\mathcal{O}\left(\varepsilon^{-3/2}\log^2(1/\varepsilon)\right)\right)$, computational complexity of encoding/decoding $n^{\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-1}\log(1/\varepsilon))}$, storage complexity $\mathcal{O}(n^{η+1}\log n)$ for a code design parameter $η>1$ that trades off storage complexity with the probability of error. The error probability is $\mathcal{O}(n^{-η})$, and the (vanishing) feedback rate is $\mathcal{O}({1}/{\sqrt{\log(n)}})$. Our full-feedback scheme has zero probability of error and minimal storage complexity, while the other parameters are the same as the vanishing rate feedback scheme.

cs.IT↗

On Cost-Aware Designs for Sequential Hypothesis Testing

We introduce Cost-Aware (CA) Sequential Hypothesis Testing (CASHT), in which an active decision-maker selects sensing actions with different, random costs to identify the true hypothesis under an average-error constraint $δ$, while minimizing the expected total cost (rather than the number of samples). For fixed costs, we prove that the optimal expected total cost scales as $Θ(\log(1/δ))$, and is achievable by Multihypothesis Sequential Probability Ratio Test-based procedures. We show that the CA design principle is to maximize the ratio of expected information gain to expected cost under the policy-induced action distribution. Guided by this principle, we adapt two classic policies to the CA setting and establish their asymptotic optimality. We then treat random costs under two revelation models: ex-post, where costs are disclosed only after a sample is obtained, and the cost-error tradeoff coincides with the fixed-cost case, and ex-ante, where costs accrue before acquisition, and the decision maker may cancel an action mid-operation. For the ex-ante model, we characterize when cancellation lowers the total cost and analyze several cost distributions in detail. Simulations confirm our findings that the CA variants consistently reduce total cost relative to their classic counterparts, and when action cancellation helps or hurts.

cs.IT↗

All you need is log

How different are several probability distributions from one another? For two distributions the standard answer is the family of Rényi divergences, singled out by two natural requirements: processing the data never makes distributions easier to tell apart, and independent repetitions add. Many problems in learning and statistics compare more than two distributions at once, such as testing among several hypotheses or bounding generalization against several priors. The same two requirements leave one kind of building block, built on a coincidence probability: how unlikely it is that independent samples, one from each distribution, all show the same empirical distribution. The logarithm is forced because repetitions add, which is already visible for a single experiment repeated. This characterization is known in greater generality, and this paper is about the meaning of its building blocks. On a finite alphabet, each building block indexed by a rational point of the simplex is the exponential rate of that coincidence as the samples grow in fixed proportions. Each is also the limiting free energy of Bayesian inference over distributions. At any amount of data, the free energy of the posterior is the coincidence measure plus two costs: the expected distance from a posterior draw to the most likely distribution, and the information gained per unit of data. Both costs vanish as data accumulate. When the comparison is conditioned on side information, every kind of building block has a conditional counterpart, and the coincidence ones alone do not suffice.

cs.IT↗