Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2209.03258

A Test for FLOPs as a Discriminant for Linear Algebra Algorithms

Aravind Sankaran·Paolo Bientinesi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Linear algebra expressions, which play a central role in countless scientific computations, are often computed via a sequence of calls to existing libraries of building blocks (such as those provided by BLAS and LAPACK). A sequence identifies a computing strategy, i.e., an algorithm, and normally for one linear algebra expression many alternative algorithms exist. Although mathematically equivalent, those algorithms might exhibit significant differences in terms of performance. Several high-level languages and tools for matrix computations such as Julia, Armadillo, Linnea, etc., make algorithmic choices by minimizing the number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs). However, there can be several algorithms that share the same (or have nearly identical) number of FLOPs; in many cases, these algorithms exhibit execution times which are statistically equivalent and one could arbitrarily select one of them as the best algorithm. It is however not unlikely to find cases where the execution times are significantly different from one another (despite the FLOP count being almost the same). It is also possible that the algorithm that minimizes FLOPs is not the one that minimizes execution time. In this work, we develop a methodology to test the reliability of FLOPs as discriminant for linear algebra algorithms. Given a set of algorithms (for an instance of a linear algebra expression) as input, the methodology ranks them into performance classes; i.e., multiple algorithms are allowed to share the same rank. To this end, we measure the algorithms iteratively until the changes in the ranks converge to a value close to zero. FLOPs are a valid discriminant for an instance if all the algorithms with minimum FLOPs are assigned the best rank; otherwise, the instance is regarded as an anomaly, which can then be used in the investigation of the root cause of performance differences.

Explore related subjects

cs.PFcs.MS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aravind Sankaran, Paolo Bientinesi. 2022-11-30. A Test for FLOPs as a Discriminant for Linear Algebra Algorithms. https://doi.org/10.1109/sbac-pad55451.2022.00033

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Performance Analysis of Low-Order, GPU-accelerated Finite Element Kernels using Kokkos

We study performance portability for low-order, matrix-free finite element kernels, using the example of a vectorial, variable-coefficient PDE operator originating in geophysical models. Written in Kokkos, the kernel is compared on NVIDIA H100, AMD MI250X, AMD MI300A and Intel PVC Max 1550 GPUs. Owing to its low order and to optimizations that reduce the arithmetic, the kernel has a low arithmetic intensity, so that its performance is determined by how the finite element assembly is mapped onto the memory hierarchy. This is a dimension in which the architectures differ even within one vendor family, causing different performance characteristics. We examine how Kokkos' hierarchical parallelism and shared scratch memory, which are used for the shared degrees of freedom of the conforming discretization, behave on each device. Finally, we show how portability gaps can be narrowed with tuning levers such as the size of the thread groups, the balance between occupancy and register use, and the atomic accumulation strategy at the end of the kernel.

cs.PF↗
arXiv2026

Measured Joules, Learned Routes: Learning to Route for Energy-Efficient LLM Serving

Large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI systems are creating rapidly growing inference energy demands as model sizes grow and reasoning trajectories extend. While in practice, many queries do not require the capabilities of the largest available model, and routinely directing such queries to a high-capability model can introduce unnecessary, considerable computation and energy consumption. In this paper, we investigate whether adaptive routing across a heterogeneous pool of LLMs can reduce this energy burden without substantially compromising task performance. We design a language-model-based router that reads in each query and selects an answer model from a fixed candidate pool. The candidate models are first profiled through an offline tournament that records their correctness, latency, power, and GPU energy for each query. Using these measurements, the router is trained through supervised fine-tuning followed by group relative policy optimization (GRPO) with the tailored paradigms. Results demonstrate that learned routing can selectively allocate expensive model capacity based on query context and improve the accuracy-energy tradeoff in multi-LLM serving. Across seven benchmark tasks, we also observe a sharp accuracy-energy phase transition among routers, providing practical insights into improving energy efficiency while maintaining LLM performance.

cs.PF↗
arXiv2026

PrefixBench-H100: Characterizing Prefix Reuse and Time-to-First-Token in H100 LLM Serving

Repeated prompt prefixes are increasingly common in LLM serving workloads, appearing in system prompts, templated retrieval-augmented generation pipelines, agent frameworks, and multi-turn conversations. Modern inference runtimes such as vLLM and TensorRT-LLM provide mechanisms for reusing previously computed KV-cache state across requests, yet it remains unclear when prefix reuse materially improves serving performance on contemporary accelerators and when its benefits are limited by scheduling, cache granularity, concurrency, or memory pressure. This paper presents PrefixBench-H100, a reproducible benchmark and measurement framework for characterizing prefix reuse on a single NVIDIA H100. PrefixBench-H100 combines controlled synthetic traces with chat-style and retrieval-style workloads, and evaluates two widely used LLM serving runtimes under matched workload conditions. The benchmark varies shared-prefix length, suffix diversity, request arrival pattern, concurrency, output length, and cache configuration, while collecting time-to-first-token, inter-token latency, end-to-end latency, throughput, cache-hit statistics, GPU memory usage, and selected profiling traces. The goal of PrefixBench-H100 is not to introduce a new caching algorithm, but to expose the practical operating envelope of prefix reuse for H100-class LLM serving. The study identifies the regime where prefix reuse provides substantial first-token latency reductions and the regime where cache pressure erodes them, while showing that cache effectiveness itself is largely insensitive to concurrency and output length; the cross-runtime differences that remain arise above the cache, in the scheduling layer.

cs.PF↗