Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2209.08414

Towards Optimal Use of Surrogate Markers to Improve Power

Abstract

Motivated by increasing pressure for decision makers to shorten the time required to evaluate the efficacy of a treatment such that treatments deemed safe and effective can be made publicly available, there has been substantial recent interest in using an earlier or easier to measure surrogate marker, $S$, in place of the primary outcome, $Y$. To validate the utility of a surrogate marker in these settings, a commonly advocated measure is the proportion of treatment effect on the primary outcome that is explained by the treatment effect on the surrogate marker (PTE). Model based and model free estimators for PTE have also been developed. While this measure is very intuitive, it does not directly address the important questions of how $S$ can be used to make inference of the unavailable $Y$ in the next phase clinical trials. In this paper, to optimally use the information of surrogate S, we provide a framework for deriving an optimal transformation of $S$, $g_{opt}(S)$, such that the treatment effect on $g_{opt}(S)$ maximally approximates the treatment effect on $Y$ in a certain sense. Based on the optimally transformed surrogate, $g_{opt}(S)$, we propose a new measure to quantify surrogacy, the relative power (RP), and demonstrate how RP can be used to make decisions with $S$ instead of $Y$ for next phase trials. We propose nonparametric estimation procedures, derive asymptotic properties, and compare the RP measure with the PTE measure. Finite sample performance of our estimators is assessed via a simulation study. We illustrate our proposed procedures using an application to the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) clinical trial to evaluate the utility of hemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose as surrogate markers for diabetes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xuan Wang, Layla Parast, Lu Tian, Tianxi Cai. 2022-09-17. Towards Optimal Use of Surrogate Markers to Improve Power. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.08414

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME