Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2209.10458

Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for Asset Allocation

Abstract

Asset allocation (or portfolio management) is the task of determining how to optimally allocate funds of a finite budget into a range of financial instruments/assets such as stocks. This study investigated the performance of reinforcement learning (RL) when applied to portfolio management using model-free deep RL agents. We trained several RL agents on real-world stock prices to learn how to perform asset allocation. We compared the performance of these RL agents against some baseline agents. We also compared the RL agents among themselves to understand which classes of agents performed better. From our analysis, RL agents can perform the task of portfolio management since they significantly outperformed two of the baseline agents (random allocation and uniform allocation). Four RL agents (A2C, SAC, PPO, and TRPO) outperformed the best baseline, MPT, overall. This shows the abilities of RL agents to uncover more profitable trading strategies. Furthermore, there were no significant performance differences between value-based and policy-based RL agents. Actor-critic agents performed better than other types of agents. Also, on-policy agents performed better than off-policy agents because they are better at policy evaluation and sample efficiency is not a significant problem in portfolio management. This study shows that RL agents can substantially improve asset allocation since they outperform strong baselines. On-policy, actor-critic RL agents showed the most promise based on our analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Adebayo Oshingbesan, Eniola Ajiboye, Peruth Kamashazi, Timothy Mbaka. 2022-09-21. Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for Asset Allocation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.10458

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Financially Guided Deep Portfolio Optimization

Portfolio optimization in real-world financial markets is notoriously difficult due to non-stationarity, noisy data, and high transaction costs. Standard predict-then-optimize methods first forecast returns and then solve for weights, compounding prediction errors and often failing under regime shifts. We propose an end-to-end framework that directly optimizes differentiable surrogates of key financial metrics (Sharpe ratio, Omega ratio, Conditional Value-at-Risk, and risk parity), allowing neural networks to learn portfolio weights via backpropagation. Our expanding-window walk-forward procedure, applied to 50 S&P 500 stocks from 2007 to 2023, incorporates realistic bid-ask spread costs and rebalances quarterly. On the challenging out-of-sample test period (2022-2023), the best model, an AttentionLSTM with the Omega-CVaR-RiskParity loss, achieves an annualized Sharpe of 0.29 and a total compounded return of +7.86%, while the S&P 500 delivers -4.52% total compounded return and an annualized Sharpe of -0.02. This outperforms the S&P 500 by 12.38 percentage points, while keeping tail risk (CVaR) nearly unchanged. The framework outperforms the equal-weight portfolio, S&P 500, and traditional methods (MVP, HRP, NCO, ERC), demonstrating that embedding financial objectives directly into model training yields robust, economically meaningful outperformance even in adverse market conditions.

q-fin.PM

The geometry of higher order modern portfolio theory

In this article, we study the generalized modern portfolio theory, with utility functions admitting higher-order cumulants. We establish that under certain genericity conditions, the utility function has a constant number of complex critical points. We study the discriminant locus of complex critical points with multiplicity. Finally, we switch our attention to the generalization of the feasible portfolio set (variety), determine its dimension, and give a formula for its degree.

q-fin.PM

Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance

Special Markowitz (SM) regularises returns and covariance jointly, relative to a reference state (mu_ref, Sigma_ref). Each eigendirection of the whitened relative operator carries a signed spectral potential Phi_k, with persistence factor psi_k = exp(-Phi_k) > 0. Positive potentials attenuate empirical deviations from the reference geometry, zero potential preserves them, and negative potentials amplify them. The persistence factor psi_k governs both the return signal and the covariance deviation: the regularised deviation from the reference is psi_k times the empirical deviation. The logarithmic potential coordinate is characterised by a multiplicative composition law on the multiplicative group of positive real numbers; the Stein loss is characterised as the unique free-energy density (within a natural class) compatible with the resulting coupling. The SM pressure functional is additive across modes the defining property of Special Markowitz.

q-fin.PM