Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2210.03554

Energy transition under scenario uncertainty: a mean-field game of stopping with common noise

Abstract

We study the impact of transition scenario uncertainty, namely that of future carbon price and electricity demand, on the pace of decarbonization of the electricity industry. To this end, we develop a theory of optimal stopping mean-field games with non-Markovian common noise and partial observation. For mathematical tractability, the theory is formulated in discrete time and with common noise restricted to a finite probability space. We prove the existence of Nash equilibria for this game using the linear programming approach. We then apply the general theory to build a discrete time model for the long-term dynamics of the electricity market subject to common random shocks affecting the carbon price and the electricity demand. We consider two classes of agents: conventional producers and renewable producers. The former choose an optimal moment to exit the market and the latter choose an optimal moment to enter the market by investing into renewable generation. The agents interact through the market price determined by a merit order mechanism with an exogenous stochastic demand. We illustrate our model by an example inspired by the UK electricity market, and show that scenario uncertainty leads to significant changes in the speed of replacement of conventional generators by renewable production.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Roxana Dumitrescu, Marcos Leutscher, Peter Tankov. 2023-12-27. Energy transition under scenario uncertainty: a mean-field game of stopping with common noise. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03554

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Operational Impact of Registry size, Cycle length, and Blood Type Distribution in Multi-Registry Kidney Exchange Programs

Kidney exchange programs address donor recipient incompatibility by exchanging donors between incompatible pairs, but single center KEPs often suffer from limited donor pools, which reduce matching efficiency. Multi registry kidney exchange programs offer a promising solution but face challenges, including heterogeneous constraints across registries, cycle-length bounds, and data-sharing limitations. This study uses simulation to compare mKEP allocation against individual registry operation, contrasting unconstrained pooling with two safeguarded mechanisms: a cumulative individual-rationality guarantee and a Shapley value based fair-share mechanism. We examine how registry size, blood-type distribution, cycle-length bounds, and dropout probability affect the size and distribution of achievable gain. Our central finding is that the benefit of joining an mKEP is systematically uneven: under blood group composition asymmetry, the easier-to-match registry gains less than its partner even under both safeguarded mechanisms, and a larger registry gains less than a smaller one when pooled. A registry combining a larger arrival rate with an easier-to-match pool may see its gain under either safeguarded mechanism fall too small to be practically significant, while registries with a higher dropout rate see a larger benefit from pooling. This unevenness concentrates in O-type recipients: an easier-to-match registry sees fewer O-type transplants within itself under pooling, though O-type transplant rates rise system-wide. Tighter cycle-length bounds increase, rather than diminish, the relative transplant-volume benefit of pooling, while match quality is only modestly affected by any factor examined. These results highlight the importance of pairing multi-registry collaboration with a carefully designed, equitable benefit-sharing mechanism to keep participation attractive for all registries involved.

math.OC

A polynomial approximation scheme for nonlinear model reduction by moment matching

We propose a procedure for the numerical approximation of invariance equations arising in the moment matching technique associated with reduced-order modeling of high-dimensional dynamical systems. The Galerkin residual method is employed to find an approximate solution to the invariance equation using a Newton iteration on the coefficients of a monomial basis expansion of the solution. These solutions to the invariance equations can then be used to construct reduced-order models. We assess the ability of the method to solve the invariance PDE system as well as to achieve moment matching and recover the steady-state behaviour of nonlinear systems with state dimension of order 1000 driven by linear and nonlinear signal generators.

math.OC

Computationally Efficient Density-Driven Optimal Control via Analytical KKT Reduction and Contractive MPC

Efficient coordination for collective spatial distribution is a fundamental challenge in multi-agent systems. Prior research on Density-Driven Optimal Control (D2OC) established a framework to match agent trajectories to a desired spatial distribution. However, implementing this as a predictive controller requires solving a large-scale Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) system, whose computational complexity grows cubically with the prediction horizon. To resolve this, we propose an analytical structural reduction that transforms the T-horizon KKT system into a condensed quadratic program (QP). This formulation achieves O(T) linear scalability, significantly reducing the online computational burden compared to conventional O(T^3) approaches. Furthermore, to ensure rigorous convergence in dynamic environments, we incorporate a contractive Lyapunov constraint and prove the Input-to-State Stability (ISS) of the closed-loop system against reference propagation drift. Numerical simulations verify that the proposed method facilitates rapid density coverage with substantial computational speed-up, enabling long-horizon predictive control for large-scale multi-agent swarms.

math.OC