Assessments and developments in constructing a National Health Index for policy making, in the United Kingdom

Anna Freni-Sterrantino; Thomas P Prescott; Greg Ceely; Myer Glickman; Chris Holmes

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2210.05154

Assessments and developments in constructing a National Health Index for policy making, in the United Kingdom

Anna Freni-Sterrantino·Thomas P Prescott·Greg Ceely·Myer Glickman·Chris Holmes

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Composite indicators are a useful tool to summarize, measure and compare changes among different communities. The UK Office for National Statistics has created an annual England Health Index (starting from 2015) comprised of three main health domains - lives, places and people - to monitor health measures, over time and across different geographical areas (149 Upper Tier Level Authorities, 9 regions and an overall national index) and to evaluate the health of the nation. The composite indicator is defined as a weighted average (linear combination) of indicators within subdomains, subdomains within domains, and domains within the overall index. The Health Index was designed to be comparable over time, geographically harmonized and to serve as a tool for policy implementation and assessment. We evaluated the steps taken in the construction, reviewing the conceptual coherence and statistical requirements on Health Index data for 2015-2018. To assess these, we have focused on three main steps: correlation analysis at different index levels; comparison of the implemented weights derived from factor analysis with two alternative weights from principal components analysis and optimized system weights; a sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to assess to what extent rankings depend on the selected set of methodological choices. Based on the results, we have highlighted features that have improved statistical requirements of the forthcoming UK Health Index.

Explore related subjects

stat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Anna Freni-Sterrantino, Thomas P Prescott, Greg Ceely, Myer Glickman, Chris Holmes. 2022-10-11. Assessments and developments in constructing a National Health Index for policy making, in the United Kingdom. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05154

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Geospatial Foundation Models Capture Health-Relevant Dimensions of Place Beyond Conventional Social Risk Indices

Area-based social risk indices summarize residents' socioeconomic conditions but incompletely capture physical features of place that may affect health. We evaluated whether numerical representations of physical place produced by four geospatial foundation model families from 2022 satellite data explained residual variance in tract-level associations between the Area Deprivation Index, Social Deprivation Index, and Social Vulnerability Index with health outcomes. We used LightGBM to predict variables from the American Community Survey and 40 chronic disease and health-behavior outcomes from CDC PLACES across 82,646 census tracts in the contiguous United States, evaluating performance across 10 held-out states. Among survey variables, models were moderately predictive of some variables including housing type (R-squared up to 0.54) but weak for disability, unemployment, and income disparity. For health outcomes, models explained up to 54% of variance left unexplained by social risk indices, with the largest gains for annual checkups, arthritis, and high blood pressure. Mean total variance explained by geospatial foundation models across the 40 health-related outcomes increased from 0.31 in the smallest tract-size decile to 0.39 in the largest. Geospatial foundation models capture health-relevant features of place not represented by conventional social risk indices and may usefully augment them in epidemiological analyses.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2026

Transporting summary measures of relative effects from randomised trials to the treated patient population: an application to breast cancer endocrine therapy

Randomised trials often report relative treatment effects, such as risk ratios and hazard ratios, for trial populations. Clinical decision-making, however, often benefits from estimates of absolute treatment effects in the population eligible for treatment. Trial participants may not represent this target population well, and restrictions on access to individual participant trial data can further complicate absolute effect estimation. Routine care data are often representative of the target population but may be subject to uncontrolled confounding. We consider estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), an absolute measure, by combining a representative sample of treated routine care patients with summary measures (i.e., estimated risk or hazard ratios) from either a randomised trial or a meta-analysis of trials. Under marginal or conditional transportability assumptions, the ATT is shown to be identifiable. The implications of collapsibility of the effect measure on transportability are discussed, and plug-in estimators of the ATT are presented. Simulation studies are used to assess finite sample performance of the estimators in a range of settings. The proposed methods are applied to estimate the ATT of endocrine therapy on 15-year breast cancer mortality using results from a meta-analysis of randomised trials and England's National Disease Registration Service.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2026

Overcoming Model Misspecification in Bayesian Inference of Molecular Signalling Networks

Bayesian inference of molecular signalling networks usually relies on tractability of the marginal likelihood, enabling the set of possible networks to be efficiently explored. As such, linear models with independent errors and conjugate priors are routinely used. However, the dynamics of molecular signalling are nonlinear, and relevant confounders are often unobserved; failure to account for these complexities will almost certainly lead to over-confident inferences in the standard Bayesian framework. To confront this reality, we develop a post-Bayesian approach to inference of molecular signalling networks, guided by the principle that uncertainty should not vanish when the statistical model is misspecified, even in the infinite-data limit. Technically, we extend the predictively-oriented (PrO) posterior of McLatchie et al. (2025) to the setting of latent variable models, empirically investigating the properties of PrO posteriors in the challenging network inference context.

stat.AP↗