Rating Triggers for Collateral-Inclusive XVA via Machine Learning and SDEs on Lie Groups

Kevin Kamm; Michelle Muniz

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2211.00326

Rating Triggers for Collateral-Inclusive XVA via Machine Learning and SDEs on Lie Groups

Kevin Kamm·Michelle Muniz

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we model the rating process of an entity by using a geometrical approach. We model rating transitions as an SDE on a Lie group. Specifically, we focus on calibrating the model to both historical data (rating transition matrices) and market data (CDS quotes) and compare the most popular choices of changes of measure to switch from the historical probability to the risk-neutral one. For this, we show how the classical Girsanov theorem can be applied in the Lie group setting. Moreover, we overcome some of the imperfections of rating matrices published by rating agencies, which are computed with the cohort method, by using a novel Deep Learning approach. This leads to an improvement of the entire scheme and makes the model more robust for applications. We apply our model to compute bilateral credit and debit valuation adjustments of a netting set under a CSA with thresholds depending on ratings of the two parties.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.RM cs.LG q-fin.CP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Kevin Kamm, Michelle Muniz. 2022-11-01. Rating Triggers for Collateral-Inclusive XVA via Machine Learning and SDEs on Lie Groups. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00326

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Dynamic reinsurance via martingale transport

We formulate a dynamic reinsurance problem in which the insurer seeks to satisfy prescribed terminal moment or risk-based constraints while minimizing the $L^2$-norm of the ceded risk. As a tool for this analysis, we first use techniques from martingale optimal transport to study the auxiliary problem in which the insurer matches a given terminal distribution of the surplus process. We show that, under suitable assumptions, this auxiliary problem admits a tractable solution analogous to the Bass martingale. We then relax this condition by only requiring certain moment or risk-based constraints.

q-fin.RM↗

arXiv2026

Risk Measures under Paired-Ambiguity: A Deep Learning Reflected BSDE Framework

We study optimal stopping under dynamic risk measures with simultaneous ambiguity in the probability model and the discount rate. We introduce a paired ambiguity framework combining Girsanov model uncertainty with cash subadditive risk evaluation and characterize the stopping value by an upper reflected backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE). We establish structural properties of the resulting stopping operator and study quadratic drivers associated with entropic risk measures, obtaining explicit stopping rules in several benchmark cases. We then develop a deep learning scheme for the reflected quadratic BSDE. The convergence analysis uses discrete reflection and truncation to reduce the quadratic problem to a globally Lipschitz system and combines reflected BSDE discretization estimates with neural network approximation errors. Numerical experiments for American options illustrate the effects of discount rate and entropic ambiguity on stopping values and exercise decisions.

q-fin.RM↗

arXiv2026

When Is the Gini Loading More Prudent? Tail Structure and the Ordering of the Standard Deviation and the Gini Mean Difference

The standard deviation (SD) and the Gini mean difference (GMD) are the two canonical measures of variability used to load premiums, set risk margins and allocate capital, yet no universal ordering between them exists. We show that the comparison is \emph{equivalent} to asking whether the coefficient of variation of the spacing $|X-X'|$ generated by two independent copies of the risk exceeds unity, so that the exponential law -- whose spacing is again exponential -- is the universal knife-edge separating the two regimes. Reading the GMD as twice the maxiance, that is, as a second-order \emph{dual} moment in the sense of Yaari's dual theory, the problem becomes an explicit comparison of primal and dual second-order variability. We derive a closed-form representation of the mean excess function of the spacing in terms of the hazard and reverse hazard rates of $X$, and use it to prove that heavy-tailed behavior -- a decreasing hazard rate or an increasing reverse hazard rate -- yields SD dominance, whereas two-sided light tails yield GMD dominance; within the monotone aging classes, equality characterizes the exponential law. Both regimes are stable under truncation, convolution and mixing, which makes them operational in collective risk and frailty models. We classify the severity, lifetime and frequency distributions of actuarial practice accordingly, quantify the consequences for SD- and Gini-loaded premium principles and for Gini-type tail risk measures, and show that the sign of $\mathrm{SD}-\mathrm{GMD}$ across thresholds furnishes a simple diagnostic for tail aging.

q-fin.RM↗