Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2212.12847

Evaluating the generalized Buchshtab function and revisiting the variance of the distribution of the smallest components of combinatorial objects

Abstract

Let $n\geq 1$ and $X_{n}$ be the random variable representing the size of the smallest component of a random combinatorial object made of $n$ elements. A combinatorial object could be a permutation, a monic polynomial over a finite field, a surjective map, a graph, and so on. By a random combinatorial object, we mean a combinatorial object that is chosen uniformly at random among all possible combinatorial objects of size $n$. It is understood that a component of a permutation is a cycle, an irreducible factor for a monic polynomial, a connected component for a graph, etc. Combinatorial objects are categorized into parametric classes. In this article, we focus on the exp-log class with parameter $K=1$ (permutations, derangements, polynomials over finite field, etc.) and $K=1/2$ (surjective maps, $2$-regular graphs, etc.) The generalized Buchstab function $Ω_{K}$ plays an important role in evaluating probabilistic and statistical quantities. For $K=1$, Theorem $5$ from \cite{PanRic_2001_small_explog} stipulates that $\mathrm{Var}(X_{n})=C(n+O(n^{-ε}))$ for some $ε>0$ and sufficiently large $n$. We revisit the evaluation of $C=1.3070\ldots$ using different methods: analytic estimation using tools from complex analysis, numerical integration using Taylor expansions, and computation of the exact distributions for $n\leq 4000$ using the recursive nature of the counting problem. In general for any $K$, Theorem $1.1$ from \cite{BenMasPanRic_2003} connects the quantity $1/Ω_{K}(x)$ for $x\geq 1$ with the asymptotic proportion of $n$-objects with large smallest components. We show how the coefficients of the Taylor expansion of $Ω_{K}(x)$ for $\lfloor x\rfloor \leq x < \lfloor x\rfloor+1$ depends on those for $\lfloor x\rfloor-1 \leq x-1 < \lfloor x\rfloor$. We use this family of coefficients to evaluate $Ω_{K}(x)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Claude Gravel, Daniel Panario. 2023-08-13. Evaluating the generalized Buchshtab function and revisiting the variance of the distribution of the smallest components of combinatorial objects. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.12847

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Orthogonal Pairs in Maps from the Sphere to the Circle

We prove that, for any $f:S^2\to S^1$ and any $\varepsilon>0$, there exist orthogonal vectors $x,y\in S^2$ such that the length of the shortest arc between $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ is at most $π/2 +\varepsilon$. This proves a conjecture of Ghebleh from 2007 that the circular chromatic number of the real orthogonality graph is equal to four.

math.CO

Exact Area-Range Minima in the Quantitative Monsky Problem for Five and Seven Triangles

For a dissection $D$ of the unit square into $n$ nondegenerate triangles, let $R(D)=\max_i a_i-\min_i a_i, Δ(n)=\inf_D R(D).$ We prove that this infimum is attained for every $n\ge2$, and determine the exact minima for $n=5$ and $n=7$, allowing T-junctions. For five triangles, $Δ(5)=\frac{5\sqrt5-11}{8};$ equality holds precisely when three areas equal $(3-\sqrt5)/4$ and two equal $(3\sqrt5-5)/8$. For seven triangles, $Δ(7)=r_7$, where $r_7$ is the unique root in $(0,1/4900)$ of $864r^4+2160r^3-6060r^2+4972r-1.$ Every minimizer has four areas $(1+3r_7)/7$ and three areas $(1-4r_7)/7$, although its geometry need not be unique. The proofs combine finite combinatorial classification with exact symbolic and integer-interval certificates. For nine triangles, a tilted-strip construction gives the explicit algebraic upper bound $Δ(9)\le 0.0001273496861283553341\ldots,$ which is the exact minimum within that topology. Conversely, every dissection in the complete single-cap two-rail zig-zag family, with arbitrary continuous areas, has range greater than $1/3500$; hence a global minimizer must lie outside that family. The exact value of $Δ(9)$ remains open.

math.CO

Chromatic symmetric functions for annular webs

We introduce a combinatorial definition of chromatic symmetric functions for annular webs. We prove their symmetry by constructing a web analogue of the Shareshian--Wachs involution and show that they coincide with the symmetric functions associated to annular webs via Turaev's isomorphism. We then derive explicit formulas for their hook Schur coefficients. We also introduce web LLT functions, whose hook Schur coefficients admit positive Laurent-polynomial formulas. These formulas yield a combinatorial expression for the coefficients of the HOMFLY--PT polynomial of an annular web.

math.CO