Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2212.13167

'Decolonisation' of the curricula and some related issues

Alexandre Borovik
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

University level mathematics in a number of countries is under pressure to `decolonise the curriculum'. This paper considers, as a test case, a possible `decolonisation' of linear algebra. This is a representative case, since linear algebra is one of the core courses of undergraduate mathematics and a mathematical discipline with a millennia long historic tradition. This paper is written for my colleagues, university mathematicians. In my opinion, it could help them to determine their position and calmly stick to it without entering into an unnecessary debate with promoters of `decolonisation of the curricula'. The paper offers a simple and honest defence against `decolonisation' pressures: tell students the real (pre)history of a particular mathematical discipline. Let us call this activity `historical enrichment'. It would be useful if all attempts at `decolonization' (and vice versa, `historical enrichment') were known to a wider circle of the mathematical community. Publicity and an open discussion are the best way to resist outside pressures to engage in virtue signalling at the expense of historical and mathematical truth. The international mathematical community should defend academic freedom and insist on our right to formulate our curricula and evaluate the history of mathematics and judge mathematicians of the past according to criteria developed within the profession, and ignore any kind of political fads and pressure

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alexandre Borovik. 2022-12-26. 'Decolonisation' of the curricula and some related issues. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.13167

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗