Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2301.02917

Dido's Problem. When a myth of ancient literature became a problem of variational calculus

Abstract

When introducing the calculus of variations, we may invoke Dido's problem to illustrate the most fundamental variational problem: to find the curve of given perimeter which bounds the greatest area. This type of problem led mathematicians to invent solution methods of maxima and minima, and the genesis of variational calculus as a distinct branch of analysis. Dido's problem was inspired by the mythical tale of the foundation of Carthage (ancient city in North Africa) by a Phoenician princess as told independently by Roman poet Virgil, and by Latin historian Justinus in the first two centuries BC. Historians have debated the facts surrounding Carthage's birth; however, contemporary mathematicians have accepted the vague events described by Virgil in his Aeneid, adding details to Dido's story to extrapolate a few verses and use as a basis for the isoperimetric theorem. Was Leonhard Euler or Lord Kelvin who first interpreted Virgil's poem as Dido's problem of variational calculus? In this article I attempt to resolve a question of historical attribution to identify who first defined Dido's problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dora Musielak. 2023-01-07. Dido's Problem. When a myth of ancient literature became a problem of variational calculus. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02917

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO