Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2301.03221

Representing Matroids over the Reals is $\exists \mathbb R$-complete

Abstract

A matroid $M$ is an ordered pair $(E,I)$, where $E$ is a finite set called the ground set and a collection $I\subset 2^{E}$ called the independent sets which satisfy the conditions: (i) $\emptyset \in I$, (ii) $I'\subset I \in I$ implies $I'\in I$, and (iii) $I_1,I_2 \in I$ and $|I_1| < |I_2|$ implies that there is an $e\in I_2$ such that $I_1\cup \{e\} \in I$. The rank $rank(M)$ of a matroid $M$ is the maximum size of an independent set. We say that a matroid $M=(E,I)$ is representable over the reals if there is a map $φ\colon E \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{rank(M)}$ such that $I\in I$ if and only if $φ(I)$ forms a linearly independent set. We study the problem of matroid realizability over the reals. Given a matroid $M$, we ask whether there is a set of points in the Euclidean space representing $M$. We show that matroid realizability is $\exists \mathbb R$-complete, already for matroids of rank 3. The complexity class $\exists \mathbb R$ can be defined as the family of algorithmic problems that is polynomial-time is equivalent to determining if a multivariate polynomial with integers coefficients has a real root. Our methods are similar to previous methods from the literature. Yet, the result itself was never pointed out and there is no proof readily available in the language of computer science.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eun Jung Kim, Arnaud de Mesmay, Tillmann Miltzow. 2024-07-11. Representing Matroids over the Reals is $\exists \mathbb R$-complete. https://doi.org/10.46298/dmtcs.10810

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Counting Small Induced Subgraphs: Hardness of Symmetry-Based Properties

Jerrum and Meeks (TOCT, JCSS 2015) introduced the counting problems $\text{IndSub}(Φ)$ for fixed graph properties $Φ$: Given an input graph $G$ and $k\in\mathbb N$, count the $k$-vertex subsets $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that the induced subgraph $G[S]$ satisfies $Φ$. For recursively enumerable $Φ$, it is known that $\text{IndSub}(Φ)$ is either #W[1]-hard or fixed-parameter tractable. A direct classification depending on $Φ$ however still remains open. In particular, the status was open for the property of graphs without nontrivial automorphisms, also mentioned in a very recent survey on parameterized counting by Roth (Comput.~Sci.~Rev.~2026). This is a natural property that evades all currently known techniques for proving #W[1]-hardness, including a general toolkit based on Fourier analysis that was very recently introduced by Curticapean and Neuen (SODA~2025). In this paper, we show that counting induced $k$-vertex graphs without nontrivial automorphisms is #W[1]-hard by constructing ``clique scaffolds'', i.e., problem-specific restrictions of the property that enable a reduction from the $k$-clique problem. More generally, we show that for every finite group $Q$, counting $k$-vertex induced subgraphs with automorphism group $Q$ is #W[1]-hard.

cs.CC

Improved Algorithms for the Remote Point Problem

The Remote Point Problem (RPP) is an algorithmic problem that asks, given a linear subspace $L \subseteq \mathbb{F}^n$ of dimension $k$, to deterministically find a vector $v \in \mathbb{F}^n$ far in Hamming distance from $L$. This problem was introduced by Alon, Panigrahy and Yekhanin [APY09], motivated in part by the matrix rigidity approach for proving circuit lower bounds. An algorithm is said to achieve remoteness $d$ if it finds a vector $v$ whose Hamming distance from $L$ is at least $d$. We observe that over the rational numbers, the problem admits a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that achieves optimal remoteness $n-k$. Over finite fields, we obtain a (modest) improvement of a result of Alon, Panigrahy and Yekhanin [APY09], and give an algorithm that achieves remoteness $Ω\left(\frac{n}{\max\{k, \log n\}} \log n\right)$.

cs.CC

Strong Selective and List-Decoding Direct Product Theorems for Quantum Query Complexity

Quantum strong direct-product theorems for specific functions have been known for nearly two decades. These have been extended to general results for function computation and state generation. The proofs of these results use a version of the multiplicative adversary method that does not naturally extend to relations. Standard strong direct-product theorems apply when algorithms must correctly answer every given question. Prior work extended them to equivalent threshold direct-product theorems, which require answers to all questions but only require that most answers are correct. We focus on two further generalizations. Strong selective direct-products apply to algorithms that adaptively choose, based on what they learn from queries, which questions from a large list to answer. This generalization is relational and useful for proving time-space tradeoffs. We prove a quantum strong selective direct-product theorem for all functions using a new multiplicative adversary formulation for relations that satisfies a strong selective direct product property while being strong enough to capture any query lower bound for functions proven by negative-weights adversaries. This was not previously known even without selectivity. The second generalization is list-decoding direct product problems introduced by Ben-David and Blais for classical randomized query complexity. These allow an algorithm to produce a large list of possible output vectors such that one of them is fully correct. They proved that such theorems hold for classical randomized complexity of all Boolean functions. We prove a quantum analogue of this theorem for all partial Boolean functions. We show that strong list-decoding direct-product theorems are implied by a special case of multiplicative adversaries which we show, via a new reduction, can be obtained from negative-weights adversaries for any Boolean-valued function.

cs.CC