Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2301.03455

Datenkompetenz im Physikstudium -- ein Erfahrungsbericht

Abstract

Do our physics curricula provide the appropriate data management competences in a world where data are considered a crucial resource and substantial funding is available for building a national research data infrastructure (German: Nationale Forschungsdateninfrastuktur = NFDI)? Although basic data evaluation and systematic documentation are practiced when students first come into contact with data, particularly in experimental physics lab courses, they do not meet the increasing demands of research and professional practice to deal with the analysis of huge datasets. In many cases, the problem starts with the fact that there is no consensus on a suitable entry-level programming language. At the Department of Physics at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, we have made minor adjustments to the physics curriculum in recent years, which we present in this article. We placed data management competences early in the bachelor curriculum, which has resulted in considerable advantages throughout the further course of studies. The authors feel that students are quickly moving into the fast lane in data management; we can already see in our research groups that they are becoming a driving force towards modern research data management. -- Vermitteln unsere Physikcurricula die passenden Datenverarbeitungskompetenzen in einer Welt, in der Daten als entscheidende Ressource betrachtet werden und erhebliche Fördermittel für eine Nationale Forschungsdateninfrastruktur (NFDI) bereitstehen? Beim Erstkontakt mit Daten, also insbesondere in den Praktika der Experimentalphysik, werden zwar elementare Datenevaluation und systematische Dokumentation eingeübt, diese genügen aber nicht den steigenden Ansprüchen der Forschung und der Berufspraxis, sich zunehmend mit der Analyse großer Datenmengen zu befassen. Es scheitert oft schon an einem Konsens über eine geeignete Einstiegsprogrammiersprache. Am Department Physik der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg haben wir in den letzten Jahren kleinere Anpassungen im Physikcurriculum vorgenommen, die wir in diesem Artikel vorstellen. Datenkompetenz wurde früh im Bachelorstudium platziert, woraus sich erhebliche Vorteile für den weiteren Studienverlauf ergeben haben. Die Autoren können sich des Eindrucks nicht erwehren, dass die Studierenden in puncto Datenkompetenz schnell auf die Überholspur gehen; wir sehen bereits jetzt in unseren Arbeitsgruppen, dass sie sich als treibende Kräfte hin zu einem modernen Forschungsdatenmanagement erweisen.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael Krieger, Heiko B. Weber, Christopher van Eldik. 2022-12-22. Datenkompetenz im Physikstudium -- ein Erfahrungsbericht. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03455

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Johann Bernoulli's analysis of elastic collisions (a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law thereby inspired)

In order to explain an elastic collision, Johann Bernoulli considered two bodies connected by a spring. Motion is defined as a succession of states of rest. Then, considering the spring to be a lever with a body at each extremity, the laws of equilibrium imply that `motion' is described by the time variation of the (common) quantity of motion of the bodies; the dynamic law is thus deduced. This inspires a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law (in one dimension) in introductory physics course; we call it ``bernoullian sequence''.

physics.ed-ph

Design and Initial Evaluation of a Photovoltaics-focused Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience in Physics

Traditional physics laboratory courses often focus on experiments with well-known results, limiting students' engagement in authentic scientific practices. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), where students engage in real research with unknown outcomes, have been shown to support positive student outcomes, such as increased self-efficacy, persistence, and engagement in scientific practices. However, discipline-specific studies of CUREs in physics remain limited. We describe the development, structure, and initial implementation of a photovoltaics-focused CURE in a second-year undergraduate physics laboratory course at the University of Colorado Boulder. To examine how students experienced the course, we analyzed end-of-semester reflection assignments using the five CURE components (i.e., scientific practices, discovery, relevance, collaboration, and iteration), as well as established dimensions of research authenticity, as analytic frameworks. Students described experiences associated with all five CURE components, with collaboration, relevance, and scientific practices appearing most prominently in their reflections. Students also associated authentic research with meaningful scientific contribution, engagement in authentic scientific practices, and navigating the uncertainty and setbacks inherent in research, although fewer explicitly identified themselves as researchers or scientists. A subset of students additionally connected the course to their immediate thinking about future academic and professional pathways. This work contributes both a discipline-specific model for implementing CUREs in experimental physics laboratory courses and provides insight into how students interpret and experience authentic research within this course context.

physics.ed-ph

A Workshop Series for Effective Use of AI in Uncertain Times: Building a Physics Faculty Learning Community

Generative AI tools are being widely taken up by students in their physics courses and beyond, often before instructors and institutions can develop policies and effective approaches for the use of these tools. Building on a framework for change in the era of AI, we developed and implemented a faculty learning community to help a university physics department address these challenges collectively. Over six biweekly sessions, faculty worked through course policies, classroom conversations about AI, AI-integrated coursework tasks, and assessment. Each session shared a common structure: we presented local data and department-sourced materials, tested them in small groups, and discussed them together, emphasizing durable pedagogical approaches over specific tools and platforms, and leading with evidence of students' own AI use. The series produced a shared, evolving repository of resources for faculty to draw on. This workshop provides an adaptable, theoretically informed model for a faculty learning community that departments can build on.

physics.ed-ph