Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2301.07742

Concurrent normals of immersed manifolds

Abstract

It is conjectured since long that for any convex body $K \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ there exists a point in the interior of $K$ which belongs to at least $2n$ normals from different points on the boundary of $K$. The conjecture is known to be true for $n=2,3,4$. Motivated by a recent results of Y. Martinez-Maure, and an approach by A. Grebennikov and G. Panina, we prove the following: Let a compact smooth $m$-dimensional manifold $M^m$ be immersed in $ \mathbb{R}^n$. We assume that at least one of the homology groups $H_k(M^m,\mathbb{Z}_2)$ with $k<m$ vanishes. Then under mild conditions, almost every normal line to $M^m$ contains an intersection point of at least $β+4$ normals from different points of $M^m$, where $β$ is the sum of Betti numbers of $M^m$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gaiane Panina, Dirk Siersma. 2023-04-26. Concurrent normals of immersed manifolds. https://doi.org/10.46298/cm.10840

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The mod 2 Seiberg-Witten invariants of spin structures and spin families

We completely determine the mod $2$ Seiberg-Witten invariants for any spin structure on any closed, oriented, smooth $4$-manifold $X$. Our computation confirms the validity of the simple type conjecture mod $2$ for spin structures. Our proof also works for families of spin $4$-manifolds and thus computes the mod $2$ Seiberg-Witten invariants for spin families. The proof of our main result uses $Pin(2)$-symmetry to define an enhancement of the mod $2$ Seiberg-Witten invariants. We prove a connected sum formula for the enhanced invariant using localisation in equivariant cohomology. Unlike the usual Seiberg-Witten invariant, the enhanced invariant does not vanish on taking connected sums and by exploiting this property, we are able to compute the enhanced invariant.

math.GT

Isotopy versus equivariant isotopy in dimensions three and higher

Given a finite group action on a smooth manifold, we study the following question: if two equivariant diffeomorphisms are isotopic, must they be equivariantly isotopic? Birman-Hilden and Maclachlan-Harvey proved the answer is "yes" for most surfaces. By contrast, we give a general criterion in higher dimensions under which there are many equivariant diffeomorphisms which are isotopic but not equivariantly isotopic. Examples satisfying this criterion include branched covers of split links and "stabilized" branched covers. We prove the result by constructing an invariant valued in the homology of a certain infinite cover of the manifold. We give applications to outer automorphism groups of free products and to group actions on manifolds which fiber over the circle.

math.GT